Quasi‐Static Indentation Resistance Behavior of Bionic Hybrid‐Helicoidal Composite Laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT To enhance the indentation resistance of composite laminates, a hybrid‐helicoidal structure inspired by the defensive microstructures of the Odontodactylus scyllarus and the Homarus americanus was proposed. Eighteen types of helicoidal configurations were designed, comprehensively considering material constituents, helical angle growth patterns (sinusoidal, linear, and quadratic), and helicoidal architectures (single‐helicoidal and hybrid‐helicoidal). The mechanical response and damage mechanisms of the composite laminates subjected to quasi‐static indentation were investigated with respect to material composition and stacking sequence. It was found that for a single material system, the optimal helical angle growth pattern depends on the constitutive properties of the material. When the laminates adopt an alternating Basalt Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer (BFRP)/Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) layup, the peak loads of most hybrid helicoidal configurations are highly consistent. This study deepens the understanding of the complex interaction mechanisms between material composition and stacking sequence in composite laminates subjected to quasi‐static indentation, providing a theoretical basis and guidance for the design of high‐performance composite materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology for Vehicle Hunan University Changsha Hunan China
College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering Hunan University Changsha Hunan China
School of Mechanical Engineering and Electronic Information China University of Geosciences Wuhan China
Funding
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.06810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.068 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1802034310.3390/ma18020343 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.geits.2022.10004310.1016/j.geits.2022.100043 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3966110.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39661 ↗
5. 10.3390/app1101038410.3390/app11010384 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.09710.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.097 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.034 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.00710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.007 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2901310.1002/pc.29013 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.10028410.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100284 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2956110.1002/pc.29561 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.027 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11452510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114525 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.06910.1016/j.msea.2009.07.069 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.03.05610.1016/j.tws.2019.03.056 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11830510.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118305 ↗
17. Effect of Fiber Orientation and Ply Stacking Sequence on Buckling Behaviour of Basalt‐Carbon Hybrid Composite Laminates
18. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10824810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108248 ↗
19. 10.1242/jeb.0183110.1242/jeb.01831 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16281710.1016/j.cej.2025.162817 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matt.2023.11.01310.1016/j.matt.2023.11.013 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20221117510.1002/adma.202211175 ↗
24. 10.1146/annurev‐physchem‐040215‐11262110.1146/annurev‐physchem‐040215‐112621 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2935210.1002/pc.29352 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20080121910.1002/adma.200801219 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.02210.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11861410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118614 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11092010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110920 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.017 ↗
31. 10.1002/nme.172810.1002/nme.1728 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.04210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.042 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ast.2024.10947510.1016/j.ast.2024.109475 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10392810.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103928 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1510240310.3390/polym15102403 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11021110.1016/j.tws.2022.110211 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.04710.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.047 ↗
39. 10.3390/biomimetics1008052510.3390/biomimetics10080525 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2954610.1002/pc.29546 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10865010.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108650 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1707086610.3390/polym17070866 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11058510.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110585 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10706410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107064 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11838710.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118387 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.02610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.026 ↗