Assessment of the Impact Performance of Sustainable Three‐Dimensional Woven Jute/Green Epoxy Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Natural fiber reinforced three dimensional (3D) woven composites are an eco‐friendly alternative to synthetic materials supporting sustainable development in automotive, packaging, aerospace and construction sectors. However, 3D interlock patterns' incorporation remains limited to tailor and enhance the impact performance of natural fiber reinforced composites. Addressing the gap, this study explores impact performance of jute/green‐epoxy composites reinforced with 3D interlock (balanced, partially balanced, and imbalanced) interlacements. Impact performance was assessed by charpy, izod, low velocity drop‐weight impact, and split hopkinson pressure bar characterization. Results revealed the significant influence of interlacement patterns variation on impact performance. Imbalanced composite structure exhibited the superior impact response for all characterizations owing to the 5/1 interlocking pattern having a combined effect of high float length and the least crimp percentage. While the balanced composite structure entailed poor impact response having the least value of impact strength and absorbed energy due to the presence of the 2/1 interlocking pattern with the least float length and the highest crimp percentage. Whereas, partially balanced composite structure showed intermediate impact performance. This work presents a baseline for 3D interlacement patterns contributing to the development of sustainable high‐performance composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management Wilson College of Textiles, NC State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
Department of Textile Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology National Textile University Faisalabad Pakistan
Department of Conservation and Built Heritage, Faculty for the Built Environment University of Malta Msida Malta
School of Fashion and Textiles RMIT University Melbourne Australia
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-1-85573-739-6.50004-X10.1016/B978-1-85573-739-6.50004-X ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.017 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.014 ↗
4. 10.1016/B978-008043938-9/50017-X10.1016/B978-008043938-9/50017-X ↗
5. Ko F. K. · 1999
6. 10.1177/00405175030730010710.1177/004051750307300107 ↗
7. 10.1016/B978-008043938-9/50014-410.1016/B978-008043938-9/50014-4 ↗
8. 10.1080/15440478.2023.216882310.1080/15440478.2023.2168823 ↗
9. 10.1177/073168441560895810.1177/0731684415608958 ↗
10. 10.1201/978020390840210.1201/9780203908402 ↗
11. Ratna D. · 2009
12. Haresceugh R. I. · 1989 · 1
13. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818712-8.00006-910.1016/B978-0-12-818712-8.00006-9 ↗
14. T. U. S. Army T. Vehicle A. Development and T. A. Strategy “Lightweight Armor for Tactical Vehicles ” Defense Update Qadima June 2013.
15. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.011 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.02.004 ↗
18. 10.1017/S000192400001336110.1017/S0001924000013361 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10443‐021‐10005‐010.1007/s10443‐021‐10005‐0 ↗
20. 10.1177/0892705723121674110.1177/08927057231216741 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2788910.1002/pc.27889 ↗
22. 10.1177/0731684423117170710.1177/07316844231171707 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.786.21510.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.786.215 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11710410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117104 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ast.2020.10584910.1016/j.ast.2020.105849 ↗
26. 10.3390/polym1505117010.3390/polym15051170 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10731410.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107314 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10443‐023‐10150‐810.1007/s10443‐023‐10150‐8 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.021 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.021 ↗
31. 10.1177/152808372094802510.1177/1528083720948025 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2586810.1002/pc.25868 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2714110.1002/pc.27141 ↗
34. “ISO Technical Committee. Determination of Charpy Impact Properties—Part 2: Instrumented Impact Test (ISO 179‐2:2020) ”2020 https://www.iso.org/standard/44852.html.
35. 10.3390/technologies1204004910.3390/technologies12040049 ↗