Mechanism of Welding Surface Roughness on Weld Joint Performance in Thermoplastic Composite Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the ultrasonic welding (USW) of glass fiber reinforced PA6 (GF/PA6) thermoplastic composites without the energy director (ED), and reveals for the first time the effect of surface roughness in USW without ED. Specifically, a coupled thermo‐mechanical finite element (FE) model was developed to analyze the welding parameters by revealing the evolution of the interfacial temperature field and molten zone. Following this, a particular emphasis was placed on the critical influence of welding surface roughness on joint properties. The results showed that using optimized welding parameters—a welding amplitude of 70% of the rated value and a welding time of 0.8 s—the lap shear strength (LSS) of GF/PA6 reached a high value of 27.6 MPa. On this basis, when the welding surface roughness was reduced from 16.3 μm to less than 9 μm through simple sanding, the diffusion and bonding of the molten resin and fibers were promoted, which further increased the LSS from 27.6 to 29.9 MPa.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Aerospace Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University Shenyang China
SAU & SYNOR‐A Co‐Innovation Lab Shenyang Aerospace University Shenyang China
Maintenance Division COMAC Shanghai Aircraft Customer Service Co., Ltd. Shanghai China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.10842810.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108428 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.10336610.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103366 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11289910.1016/j.tws.2024.112899 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11124710.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111247 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10443‐024‐10291‐410.1007/s10443‐024‐10291‐4 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.07210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.08.072 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11665‐025‐10693‐w10.1007/s11665‐025‐10693‐w ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11079510.1016/j.tws.2023.110795 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.00410.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11256110.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112561 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2924410.1002/pc.29244 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma1715363810.3390/ma17153638 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00170‐025‐15678‐610.1007/s00170‐025‐15678‐6 ↗
14. 10.1002/app.5720710.1002/app.57207 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.00410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13414810.1016/j.matlet.2023.134148 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10864810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108648 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.00910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.05410.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.054 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym1404068310.3390/polym14040683 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.07.02410.1016/j.jmapro.2017.07.024 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.04310.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.043 ↗
24. 10.1177/089270570935649310.1177/0892705709356493 ↗
25. 10.1080/0021846060094851110.1080/00218460600948511 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.02310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.12.023 ↗