Experimental Study on Anchoring Performance of Wedge Anchorage for Prestressed Basalt Fiber‐Reinforced Plastics Laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the anchorage technique for prestressed basalt fiber‐reinforced plastics (BFRP) laminates in reinforced concrete (RC) beams. The elastic modulus of fiber‐reinforced plastics (FRP) laminates is identified as a key factor influencing stress distribution and peak values in the anchorage zone. A BFRP laminate wedge anchorage system with weakened wedges is proposed to address the challenges associated with anchoring low‐modulus FRP laminates. The effects of wedge material, anchorage length, wedge slope angle, and laminate thickness on anchorage performance are examined through experimental testing. Finite element method (FEM) analysis is conducted to study stress distribution under different anchorage conditions. Results show that low‐modulus laminates experience greater lateral deformation, leading to pronounced “end effects” and reduced anchorage efficiency. Anchorages designed for high‐modulus laminates are ineffective for low‐modulus laminates and are prone to splitting failures. Experimental findings reveal that reducing wedge modulus and increasing anchorage length significantly improve anchorage efficiency. By optimizing the degree of wedge weakening, anchorage efficiency increases from 70% to 100%. FEM analysis further confirms that weakened wedges reduce peak stress concentrations and relieve lateral deformation, shifting the stress peak toward the laminate center and enhancing anchorage performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of C & PC Structures Ministry of Education Southeast University Nanjing China
School of Civil Engineering Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China
Composites Division, Jiangsu Green Materials Valley New Material T&D Co., Ltd Nanjing China
California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo USA
University of Leeds Leeds UK
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.03810.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.038 ↗
2. 10.1002/978047012142910.1002/9780470121429 ↗
3. Anchoring and Stressing Methods for Prestressed FRP Plates: State‐of‐the‐Art Review10.1177/07316844241258864 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.06210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.062 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2984510.1002/pc.29845 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.06510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.065 ↗
7. 10.1617/s11527-025-02607-y10.1617/s11527-025-02607-y ↗
8. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.05410.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.054 ↗
9. 10.1061/jccof2.Cceng‐424710.1061/jccof2.Cceng‐4247 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym601011410.3390/polym6010114 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13513310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135133 ↗
12. SIKA “Prestressing Systems for Structural Strengthening With Sika Carbodur ”2015.
13. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10499110.1016/j.istruc.2023.104991 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9445(2001)127:7(784)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9445(2001)127:7(784) ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2001)5:4(214)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2001)5:4(214) ↗
16. 10.1260/13694330332241921410.1260/136943303322419214 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.037 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10680710.1016/j.istruc.2024.106807 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0263‐8223(98)00070‐110.1016/S0263‐8223(98)00070‐1 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2008)12:3(266)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2008)12:3(266) ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2001)5:4(221)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2001)5:4(221) ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2011.07.025 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.05.054 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000027610.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000276 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.05110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.051 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.000037210.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0000372 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.02110.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.021 ↗
28. 10.3390/ma1310221710.3390/ma13102217 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11029‐013‐9363‐110.1007/s11029‐013‐9363‐1 ↗
30. ACI 440 “ACI 440.4R‐04: Prestressing Concrete Structures With FRP Tendons: Reported by ACI Committee 440 ”2014 1–35.
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9445(1992)118:5(1270)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9445(1992)118:5(1270) ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.011 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11200410.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112004 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2008)12:4(446)10.1061/(ASCE)1090‐0268(2008)12:4(446) ↗
35. 10.1617/s11527‐011‐9725‐x10.1617/s11527‐011‐9725‐x ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.0001110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943‐5614.00011 ↗
37. Wu Z. · 2017
38. 10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.11180110.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.111801 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2846510.1002/pc.28465 ↗
40. Wen B. · 2020