journal article·2026-02-20Open access

Mechanical Performance Assessment and Streamlined Life‐Cycle Analysis of Random‐Waste Coir‐Fiber Metal Laminates

Júlio C. dos Santos, Guilherme G. Braga, André L. Christóforo, Rodrigo T. Santos Freire, José R. Tarpani, Tulio H. Panzera, Fabrizio Scarpa

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores sandwich structures based on the waste fiber metal laminate concept, integrating short random‐coir‐fiber composites with aluminium skins. The research investigates the combination of low‐cost aluminum alloy and natural fiber composites, focusing on three matrix systems: epoxy, polyester, and castor oil—a biobased, innovative alternative to conventional petroleum‐based polymers. Mechanical performance is evaluated through tensile, flexural, and interlaminar shear strength tests, supported by Classical Laminate and Laminated Beam Theories. A simplified life cycle assessment is conducted using the MECO matrix to assess environmental impact. To enhance skin‐core interfacial bonding, aluminum surfaces are treated with NaOH, followed by a pre‐primer application. Results reveal flexural modulus values ranging from 24.19 to 29.05 GPa and flexural strength between 89.47 and 103.07 MPa, demonstrating the competitive performance of these hybrid materials. A key contribution is the development of a strategy to improve interlaminar bonding, with NaOH‐treated epoxy‐CoRALs exhibiting a 15% increase in flexural strength compared to polyester‐CoRALs. Castor‐oil‐based CoRALs demonstrate superior specific mechanical properties and eco‐efficiency, requiring fewer processing steps and offering a sustainable alternative for lightweight structural applications. The MECO matrix analysis highlights the potential of castor‐oil CoRAL to achieve a win‐win scenario in eco‐mechanical performance, combining sustainability with competitive mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

GECoM – Group of Engineered Composite Materials, Department of Materials Engineering, EESC‐USP São Carlos School of Engineering ‐ University of São Paulo São Carlos Brazil

Centre for Innovation and Technology in Composite Materials – CITeC, Department of Mechanical Engineering Federal University of São João del Rei‐UFSJ São João del Rei Brazil

Department of Civil Engineering Federal University of São Carlos São Carlos Brazil

Department of Natural Sciences Federal University of São João del Rei‐UFSJ São João del Rei Brazil

Bristol Composites Institute (BCI) University of Bristol Bristol UK

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/su1603122310.3390/su16031223 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.10043510.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100435 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-3-030-78044-910.1007/978-3-030-78044-9 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2584310.1002/pc.25843 ↗
5. 10.1002/app.4874110.1002/app.48741 ↗
6. 10.1007/s43615-021-00019-y10.1007/s43615-021-00019-y ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2725610.1002/pc.27256 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10909910.1016/j.jobe.2024.109099 ↗
9. Saha A. · 2025
10. 10.1002/pc.2710910.1002/pc.27109 ↗
11. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100080-9.00017-810.1016/B978-0-08-100080-9.00017-8 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.02.00810.1016/j.indcrop.2017.02.008 ↗
13. 10.3390/app1204186910.3390/app12041869 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11514210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115142 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.08810.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.088 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11289310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112893 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11509310.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115093 ↗
18. 10.1007/s13399‐023‐04914‐210.1007/s13399‐023‐04914‐2 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13748610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137486 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20240018310.1002/adem.202400183 ↗
21. 10.1007/s13399‐022‐03293‐410.1007/s13399‐022‐03293‐4 ↗
22. 10.3390/su1607306610.3390/su16073066 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12350510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123505 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.10282510.1016/j.technovation.2023.102825 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11367‐020‐01755‐310.1007/s11367‐020‐01755‐3 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12516410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125164 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16761110.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167611 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10380010.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103800 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.08710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.087 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.016 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.08.01310.1016/j.tws.2017.08.013 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.bamboo.2024.10011510.1016/j.bamboo.2024.100115 ↗
33. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.03.28410.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.03.284 ↗
34. 10.1590/1980‐5373‐mr‐2021‐046410.1590/1980‐5373‐mr‐2021‐0464 ↗
35. 10.1007/s13399‐023‐04709‐510.1007/s13399‐023‐04709‐5 ↗
36. 10.1177/1464420723121964710.1177/14644207231219647 ↗
37. ASTM ASTM E8/E8M‐22 “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials ”ASTM Int. U.S.A (2022) https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M‐22.10.1520/E0008_E0008M ↗
38. ASTM D3039/D3039M‐14 “Standard Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials1 ”(2014) 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1520/D3039.
39. ASTM D790‐15 “Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials ”D790 2015 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1520/D0790‐15E02.10.1520/D0790 ↗
40. D2344/D2344M‐22 “Standard Test Method for Short‐Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates ”Astm (2022) 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1520/D2344_D2344M‐22.10.1520/D2344_D2344M ↗
41. ASTM D7264/D7264M‐21 “Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials ”ASTM (2021) 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1520/D7264_D7264M‐21.10.1520/D7264_D7264M ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2013.08.003 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10794210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107942 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12263310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122633 ↗
45. Komatsu J. S. · 2020
46. Gibson R. F. · 1994 · 579
47. Levy Neto F. · 2006 · 300
48. 10.1038/s41598‐023‐42024‐110.1038/s41598‐023‐42024‐1 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.11.00810.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.11.008 ↗
50. 10.3390/polym1309136910.3390/polym13091369 ↗
51. 10.1002/polb.2172910.1002/polb.21729 ↗
52. 10.1063/5.009932210.1063/5.0099322 ↗
53. 10.1039/d2ra04206a10.1039/d2ra04206a ↗
54. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.11089810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110898 ↗
55. Kim J. F. · 2024
56. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16433810.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164338 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11206810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112068 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.04310.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.043 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.07.05710.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.07.057 ↗
60. 10.1016/S1044‐5803(03)00094‐910.1016/S1044‐5803(03)00094‐9 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.01410.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.014 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10348110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103481 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11078810.1016/j.tws.2023.110788 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.01.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.01.004 ↗
65. 10.1016/B978-0-323-26435-8.00005-810.1016/B978-0-323-26435-8.00005-8 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.007 ↗
67. M. A.Butt A.Chughtai J.Ahmad R.Ahmad U.Majeed andI. H.Khan “Theory of Adhesion and its Practical Implications A Critical Review ” 2007.
68. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.010 ↗
69. 10.1177/073168441139853610.1177/0731684411398536 ↗
70. 10.3390/su1409508210.3390/su14095082 ↗
71. José R. · 2025
72. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10942610.1016/j.tws.2022.109426 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.017 ↗
75. 10.1007/s40430‐023‐04140‐x10.1007/s40430‐023‐04140‐x ↗