Dynamic Damage and Energy Dissipation Mechanisms of B 4 C Ceramic/Fiber Laminated Composite Armor
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Ceramic/fiber laminated composite armor represents a significant advancement in ballistic armor technology, offering notable advantages in providing lightweight protection. A finite element model of B 4 C ceramic/Carbon Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composite armor, incorporating strain‐rate effects, was developed to evaluate its performance under high‐velocity impacts. Under equal areal density conditions, the 5 mm B 4 C/10 mm CFRP configuration exhibited the highest specific energy absorption efficiency and the lowest residual projectile energy. Numerical simulations reveal a synergistic protection mechanism for composite armor: the ceramic layer forms conical cracks and fragments upon impact, dissipating energy through crack propagation and brittle fragmentation, while the CFRP fiber layer absorbs residual kinetic energy through progressive fiber failure, matrix cracking, and interlaminar delamination. Comparative analysis indicates that the thickness of the ceramic layer primarily affects the initial energy dissipation efficiency; excessively thick ceramic layers reduce energy transfer efficiency, whereas adequate fiber layer thickness enhances secondary energy absorption through stress homogenization. This research offers valuable insights into the design of lightweight composite armor with an optimized ceramic‐to‐fiber thickness ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aerospace Engineering Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics Zhengzhou Henan China
School of Materials Science and Engineering Beihang University Beijing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.00110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10809010.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108090 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2007.01.023 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msec.2012.12.05810.1016/j.msec.2012.12.058 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.08710.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.087 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11294110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112941 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2814710.1002/pc.28147 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.01810.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.018 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2771510.1002/pc.27715 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.06410.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.064 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10902310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109023 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10967810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109678 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.04210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.042 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2621410.1002/pc.26214 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.15110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.151 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.04.02110.1016/j.ceramint.2023.04.021 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-024-71255-z10.1038/s41598-024-71255-z ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.04010.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.040 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.08810.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.088 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.37410.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.374 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1315342710.3390/ma13153427 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.12.34410.1016/j.ceramint.2023.12.344 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10979710.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109797 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.017 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10089110.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100891 ↗
29. A Computational Constitutive Model for Brittle Materials Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Pressures
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10859910.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108599 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.07110.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.071 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.15010.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.150 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.05.013 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11278510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112785 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11132810.1016/j.tws.2023.111328 ↗
36. 10.1520/CTR10619J10.1520/CTR10619J ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.10369210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103692 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2803710.1002/pc.28037 ↗
39. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.04.012 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.02110.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.021 ↗
42. Optimum Design of Ceramic Composite Armor and Residual Bending Strength After Projectile Impact
43. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.01.01010.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.01.010 ↗