Characterization of Unidirectional Aligned Discontinuous Fiber Reinforced Composites Containing a Toughened Epoxy Resin Produced Using the HiPerDiF Process
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Aligned discontinuous fiber reinforced composites (ADFRC) offer promising applications due to their manufacturability and tailorable mechanical properties. In this study, the high performance discontinuous fiber (HiPerDiF) technology is used to produce ADFRC consisting of 3 and 6 mm long virgin carbon fibers and a highly toughened commercial epoxy resin (CYCOM 977–2). The HiPerDiF machine settings were optimized and the resultant physical and mechanical attributes systematically analyzed to show improvements in tensile performance and microstructure quality. There was an increase in stiffness by 3%, strength by 28% and failure strain by 26% compared to samples produced with initial machine settings. 73% of fibers were spatially aligned within 10° and 62% of fibers aligned in‐plane within 10°. ADFRC specimens with 6 mm fibers at 23% fiber volume fraction were optimally prepared to retain 32% of the stiffness, 30% of the strength and 57% of the failure strain in comparison with tested unidirectional continuous composite specimens containing similar constituent materials. This work has demonstrated the viability of producing aligned discontinuous fiber preform in high volume resulting in composites with improved tensile performance. With the upscaled HiPerDiF machine, improved mechanical performance can be achieved when the machine settings and fiber properties are optimized to maintain a high alignment and consistent areal weight.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil, Aerospace and Design Engineering University of Bristol Bristol UK
Department of Chemistry Materials, and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta” Milan Italy
School of Engineering, UWE Bristol Bristol UK
Syensqo Wrexham UK
μ‐VIS X‐Ray Imaging Centre, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.007 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0054351910.1007/BF00543519 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.75009010510.1002/pc.750090105 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.005 ↗
5. “Lineat ”accessed June 5 2024 https://lineat.co.uk/.
6. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.10741810.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.107418 ↗
7. 10.3390/MA1523869810.3390/MA15238698 ↗
8. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2022.11013910.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2022.110139 ↗
9. I.Hamerton C.Ward K.Potter T.Rendall andM.Longana “High Performance Discontinuous Fibre Composites ‐ A Sustainable Route to the Next Generation of Composites‐EP/P027393/1 ”2017 https://gow.epsrc.ukri.org/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=EP/P027393/1.
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.018 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.014 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1608108910.3390/polym16081089 ↗
13. 10.3390/recycling304005210.3390/recycling3040052 ↗
14. 10.3390/ma1408188510.3390/ma14081885 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11090310.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110903 ↗
16. “Syensqo ”accessed June 5 2024 https://www.syensqo.com/en/.
17. 10.1007/s10853‐006‐1198‐x10.1007/s10853‐006‐1198‐x ↗
18. 10.1002/PC.2268510.1002/PC.22685 ↗
19. 10.1080/10618562.2021.187622710.1080/10618562.2021.1876227 ↗
20. Characterization of Fibre Floccula Tion Regimes by a Crowding Factor
21. 10.1177/0731684423119054210.1177/07316844231190542 ↗
22. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2016.07.02110.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2016.07.021 ↗
23. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2014.11.00610.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2014.11.006 ↗
24. 10.1080/20550340.2018.145650410.1080/20550340.2018.1456504 ↗
25. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2015.04.00110.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2015.04.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00072-310.1016/S0266-3538(96)00072-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/0022‐5096(79)90007‐310.1016/0022‐5096(79)90007‐3 ↗
28. M. R.Hartwich N.Höhn H.Mayr K.Sandau andR.Stengler “FASEP Ultra‐Automated Analysis of Fibre Length Distribution in Glass‐Fibre‐Reinforced Products ”2009 Proc SPIE Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection VI 738921 14–18 June 2009 Munich Germany 7389:653–658 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.827503.10.1117/12.827503 ↗
29. 10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2019.02.03110.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2019.02.031 ↗
30. 10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2004.10.00210.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2004.10.002 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.03810.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.038 ↗
34. ASTM “D3171 Standard Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials ”2022 ASTM International https://doi.org/10.1520/D3171‐22.10.1520/D3171 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.016 ↗
36. ASTM “D3039/D3039M Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials ”2014 ASTM International https://doi.org/10.1520/D3039/D3039M‐08.
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10815210.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108152 ↗
38. 10.1088/0508‐3443/3/3/30210.1088/0508‐3443/3/3/302 ↗
39. 10.1016/0266‐3538(93)90146‐810.1016/0266‐3538(93)90146‐8 ↗