journal article·2025-10-10Open access

Estimation of interlaminar shear strength of CF/PEKK composites by full‐field data‐based numerical simulations of short beam shear tests

J. P. Márquez Costa, R. Arquier, G. Lesimple, J.‐B. Marijon, B. Fayolle, I. Iliopoulos, G. Regnier, G. Miquelard‐Garnier

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue S3

Abstract

Abstract A hybrid methodology is proposed to estimate the Interlaminar Shear Strength (ILSS) of Carbon Fiber and Polyetherketoneketone (CF/PEKK) composites from Short Beam Shear (SBS) tests. Digital Image Correlation (DIC) is used to capture the apparent shear behavior during loading as well as to detect the first sign of diffuse damage, characteristic of thermoplastic behavior. Simulations based on Finite Element Method (FEM) considering the orthotropic ply behavior allowed us to estimate the shear stress fields and finally, to identify the ILSS using a DIC‐based criterion. The methodology is applied to two types of manufactured laminates prepared with a non‐optimal and an optimal manufacturing cycle, to assess the impact of consolidation on macroscopic shear behavior. The estimated ILSS values (62.3 and 70.2 MPa for each manufacturing cycle, respectively) are compared with those obtained from the standard ASTM D2344 (88.1 and 95.7 MPa, respectively) whose limitations are discussed, particularly the out‐of‐plane shear behavior hypothesis. Highlights ILSS obtained via dialog between DIC full‐field data and FEM‐based simulations. Significant differences between SBS strength and ILSS for thermoplastic composites. SBS strength is not representative of ILSS for thermoplastic composites. ILSS is strongly correlated to the composite microstructure at the interply. ILSS is impacted by nonlinear shear behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratoire PIMM Arts et Métiers Sciences et Technologies, CNRS‐UMR 8006, CNAM Paris France

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/app.4444110.1002/app.44441 ↗
2. 10.1179/174328008X32522310.1179/174328008X325223 ↗
3. Advances in thermoplastic composites over three decades – a literature review. NASA/ TM–20240005376
4. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10403610.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104036 ↗
5. 10.3389/fmats.2020.0019510.3389/fmats.2020.00195 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10741210.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107412 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.03.00110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.03.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.07.00510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.07.005 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsapm.2c0151510.1021/acsapm.2c01515 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2784710.1002/pc.27847 ↗
11. Berthelot J‐M · 2012
12. 10.1201/b1629510.1201/b16295 ↗
13. Herman M · 2022
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11030010.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110300 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.02.007 ↗
16. Laurin F · 2023
17. 10.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00073-510.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00073-5 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10443‐016‐9573‐510.1007/s10443‐016‐9573‐5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.002 ↗
20. 10.1080/09276440.2016.123711310.1080/09276440.2016.1237113 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00009‐910.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00009‐9 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00398-110.1016/S0924-0136(97)00398-1 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.003 ↗
24. ASTM D6415/D6415M‐06a(2013) · 2013
25. ASTM D2344/D2344M‐16 · 2016
26. ASTM D5528 · 2007
27. ASTM D7905/D7905M‐14 · 2014
28. 10.3390/polym1311177910.3390/polym13111779 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11075410.1016/j.matdes.2022.110754 ↗
30. 10.3390/jcs610031810.3390/jcs6100318 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10888410.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108884 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.010 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.018 ↗
34. Adams D · 2004
35. Hexcel® HexTow® Hexcel.Technical Data Sheet – AS7 12K Standard Modulus Carbon Fiber.
36. Kepstan Arkema.Technical Data Sheet – 7000 Series.
37. 10.1007/BF0232282510.1007/BF02322825 ↗
38. PaulPC SaffCR SangerKB MahlerMA KanHP KautzEF.Out of plane analysis for composite structures. NASA/ TM – 19920023283.1990.
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10586510.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105865 ↗
40. 10.1051/mfreview/202000710.1051/mfreview/2020007 ↗
41. 10.1177/002199832096707310.1177/0021998320967073 ↗
42. 10.3389/fmats.2022.86395210.3389/fmats.2022.863952 ↗
43. SinclairJH ChamisCC.Mechanical behavior and fracture characteristics of off‐axis fiber composites I – Experimental investigation. NASA/TP – 1081.1977.
44. Berthelot J‐M · 2013
45. Márquez Costa JP · 2019
46. Márquez CostaJP.Caractérisation et modélisation des interfaces dans les composites organiques stratifiés à haute température: Application à la tenue au feu des structures aéronautiques. PhD Thesis.2021.
47. Jones E · 2018
48. Gay D · 2005
49. Ha SK · 2002
50. 10.1177/105678950606794110.1177/1056789506067941 ↗
51. 10.1016/0266‐3538(91)90049‐U10.1016/0266‐3538(91)90049‐U ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10604710.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106047 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.08110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.081 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.1071010.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10710 ↗