Study on the preparation and mechanical properties of resistance‐welded glass fiber/polypropylene cylindrical shell structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract When thermoplastic composite cylindrical shell structures are applied to large‐scale structures, their connection issues remain a challenge in engineering. Particularly, the mechanical properties and structural stability of the welding areas of cylindrical shells under external forces are critical considerations in the design and manufacturing process. This paper prepared glass fiber/polypropylene (GFPP) complete cylindrical shell structures (CCS) and GFPP resistance‐welded cylindrical shell structures (RWCSS) using vacuum hot‐pressing technology and resistance welding processes. Through radial and axial compression tests, it was found that under radial compression conditions, RWCSS had an average peak load 81.50 N (14.90%) lower than CCS, Meanwhile, its initial stiffness and average crushing force increased by 3.06 N/mm (60%) and 62.46 N (22.62%) respectively. After initial radial compression, CCS was more likely to experience buckling deformation and tearing along the cracks when subjected to axial compression. In contrast, RWCSS mainly exhibited folding deformation along the connection interface, accompanied by local fiber and matrix cracking. Low‐velocity impact tests using a drop‐weight impact test indicated that the damage to RWCSS was primarily at the edges of the connection area and the fibers and matrix of the upper and lower cylindrical shells. Highlights Compared with CCS, the initial stiffness and average crushing force of RWCSS under radial compression increased by 60% and 22.62% respectively. The average peak displacement of RWCSS after radial compression under axial compression is twice that of CCS. Low‐velocity impact tests reveal damage in RWCSS is primarily at connection edges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Aerospace Engineering Chongqing University Chongqing China
Chemotechnology Hubei Institute of Aerospace Xiangyang China
College of Materials and New Energy Chongqing University of Science and Technology Chongqing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2681710.1002/pc.26817 ↗
2. 10.1080/09506608.2019.158500410.1080/09506608.2019.1585004 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170‐022‐08753‐910.1007/s00170‐022‐08753‐9 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1616229510.3390/polym16162295 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2842610.1002/pc.28426 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11697810.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116978 ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.2515310.1002/pen.25153 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2865210.1002/pc.28652 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11757410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117574 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.10.04810.1016/j.tws.2017.10.048 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.04910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.049 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.021 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1719479710.3390/ma17194797 ↗
14. 10.3390/ma1306128410.3390/ma13061284 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(00)00025‐710.1016/S0266‐3538(00)00025‐7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jajp.2024.10025210.1016/j.jajp.2024.100252 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11081010.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110810 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1315256010.3390/polym13152560 ↗
19. 10.19936/j.cnki.2096‐8000.20240828.00710.19936/j.cnki.2096‐8000.20240828.007 ↗
20. 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20190807.00210.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20190807.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.012 ↗
22. 10.1177/002199830203600650710.1177/0021998302036006507 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2765910.1002/pc.27659 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11165710.1016/j.tws.2024.111657 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11677110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116771 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11619310.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116193 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.07610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.076 ↗
28. 10.1007/s12221-024-00513-810.1007/s12221-024-00513-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11174210.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111742 ↗
30. 10.1007/s12221-022-4290-110.1007/s12221-022-4290-1 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12221-023-00407-110.1007/s12221-023-00407-1 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2763010.1002/pc.27630 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.10441410.1016/j.jmps.2021.104414 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tws.2005.06.00910.1016/j.tws.2005.06.009 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.02.03410.1016/j.tws.2019.02.034 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.11.01610.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2008.11.016 ↗
37. ZhangY QinW ChenL et al.Fabrication and mechanical properties of thermoplastic corrugated sandwich panel with enhanced face‐core interface. 45 10619–10631.10.1002/pc.28495 ↗
38. Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics:ASTM D695‐15[S].2015.
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11831110.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118311 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0734‐743X(00)00060‐910.1016/S0734‐743X(00)00060‐9 ↗
41. Standard A.D7136/D7136M‐05. Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop‐Weight Impact Event. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International.2005.
42. 10.3390/polym1606079110.3390/polym16060791 ↗