Thermal Decomposition Kinetics and Viscoelastic Properties of Epoxy Nanocomposites: Comparative Study of Graphene, GO , and rGO Nanoparticle Effects
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Graphene‐family nanofillers were dispersed at loadings (≤ 0.60 wt%) into a diglycidyl ether of bisphenol‐A epoxy to elucidate how the sheet chemistry of graphene (Gr), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and graphene oxide (GO) governs thermal stability and visco‐elastic behavior. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that Gr raised the 5% mass‐loss onset temperature by 25.7°C and lowered the peak degradation rate by 18% versus neat epoxy, whereas rGO and GO offered moderate gains. Isoconversional kinetic modeling indicated a 15 to 25 kJ mol −1 increase in apparent activation energy throughout the conversion range, confirming that Gr creates a more energy‐intensive degradation pathway through tortuous, heat‐shielding barriers. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) revealed a 16.6% enhancement in storage modulus ( E ') at 25°C for the Gr composite while maintaining tan δ = 0.43, evidencing efficient stress transfer without compromising damping. All improvements were realized below the electrical percolation threshold, preserving viscosity and density critical for aerospace and electronic encapsulation. These results establish pristine graphene as the most effective single additive route to simultaneously elevate thermal reliability and mechanical resilience in epoxy matrices, while rGO and GO enable application‐specific tuning of damping or glass transition temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Shiraz University of Technology Shiraz Iran
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Shiraz University Shiraz Iran
School of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/03602559.2012.72705710.1080/03602559.2012.727057 ↗
2. Fracture Toughening Mechanisms in Epoxy Adhesives
3. 10.1007/s00339-021-05095-310.1007/s00339-021-05095-3 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym808028110.3390/polym8080281 ↗
5. The Influence of Nano‐Silica on the Wear and Mechanical Performance of Vinyl‐Ester/Glass Fiber Nanocomposites
6. Mechanical Properties Investigation of Glass/fiber Reinforced Vinyl Ester/Clay Nanocomposites Fabricated by Vacuum Bag Molding
7. 10.1615/CompMechComputApplIntJ.202103704610.1615/CompMechComputApplIntJ.2021037046 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10529010.1016/j.rineng.2025.105290 ↗
9. Theoretical and Experimental Study on the Effect of Multi‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Improving the Tensile Properties and Toughness of Vinyl Ester Resin
10. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl073187210.1021/nl0731872 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20100106810.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
13. 10.1039/c2nr30837a10.1039/c2nr30837a ↗
14. 10.1039/C5RA13897C10.1039/C5RA13897C ↗
15. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 ↗
16. 10.1039/B917103G10.1039/B917103G ↗
17. 10.3390/polym909044910.3390/polym9090449 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.020 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2012.06.021 ↗
20. 10.1002/smll.20090148010.1002/smll.200901480 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2017.04.026 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.014 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12221-014-0326-510.1007/s12221-014-0326-5 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceja.2023.10053710.1016/j.ceja.2023.100537 ↗
25. 10.1080/01694243.2019.159589010.1080/01694243.2019.1595890 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.00510.1016/j.polymer.2018.03.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.05410.1016/j.polymer.2013.09.054 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41598-018-34976-610.1038/s41598-018-34976-6 ↗
29. 10.3390/nano1407060210.3390/nano14070602 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tca.2020.17878510.1016/j.tca.2020.178785 ↗
31. 10.15407/hftp11.03.29110.15407/hftp11.03.291 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00466-013-0948-210.1007/s00466-013-0948-2 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.10387410.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103874 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.08910.1016/j.aej.2024.07.089 ↗
35. 10.4236/ojcm.2024.14100510.4236/ojcm.2024.141005 ↗
36. 10.1038/srep0390910.1038/srep03909 ↗
37. 10.1039/C4TA02693D10.1039/C4TA02693D ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.10932110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109321 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.10.05210.1016/j.jmst.2021.10.052 ↗
40. 10.3390/polym1502029910.3390/polym15020299 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.11017910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110179 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jaap.2016.03.00910.1016/j.jaap.2016.03.009 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.tca.2024.17969010.1016/j.tca.2024.179690 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-019-14130-010.1038/s41467-019-14130-0 ↗
45. 10.1039/C9NR06952F10.1039/C9NR06952F ↗
46. 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.10347310.1016/j.rinp.2020.103473 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2024.11073110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2024.110731 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10868710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108687 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12610710.1016/j.polymer.2023.126107 ↗
50. 10.1021/am508482n10.1021/am508482n ↗
51. 10.1166/jnn.2019.1633610.1166/jnn.2019.16336 ↗
52. 10.3390/polym703039010.3390/polym7030390 ↗