In‐situ CT Tensile Damage Characterization of Carbon/Glass Hybrid Laminates via Image Reconstruction and Digital Volume Correlation
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study conducted an in‐situ computed tomography (CT) characterization investigation on the damage evolution mechanisms of carbon/glass fiber reinforced plastic (G/CFRP) stacking as [G0/90 3 ,C0/90 2 ,G0/90 3 ] s under tensile loading, utilizing image reconstruction and digital volume correlation (DVC) techniques. Through μCT, microstructural images of the specimen were captured at various tensile loading stages. Three‐dimensional reconstruction algorithms were employed to construct models for analyzing void distribution, fiber fracture, and interlaminar failure behaviors. Experimental results demonstrated that the damage evolution in C/GFRP primarily manifests as initial void propagation, interlaminar crack initiation, and heterogeneous fiber interfacial failure, with substantial void expansion exerting significant influence on mechanical properties. DVC analysis further revealed the strain field distribution within the specimen, identifying strain concentration zones predominantly at the interface between carbon and glass fiber layers. These strain fields exhibited progressive expansion along the thickness direction with increasing load. Combined analysis with stress–strain curves revealed accelerated damage evolution rates in glass fiber layers, leading to overall material strength degradation. By integrating μCT and DVC methodologies, this research provides microscopic experimental evidence for understanding damage mechanisms in C/GFRP, while offering theoretical support for the design and optimization of low‐cost hybrid laminates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering Sichuan University of Science and Engineering Yibin China
School of Mechanical Engineering Sichuan University Chengdu China
State Key Laboratory of Rail Transit Vehicle System Southwest Jiaotong University Chengdu China
Material Corrosion and Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Sichuan University of Science and Engineering Zigong China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11333610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113336 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11222710.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112227 ↗
3. 10.1051/e3sconf/20256170301810.1051/e3sconf/202561703018 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11182510.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111825 ↗
5. R.Guo Y.Niu J.Tian andR.Chen “Effect of Fiber Hybrid Mode on Fatigue Life and Failure Mechanism of C/Gfrp Hybrid Rod. Gfrp Hybrid Rod ”.
6. 10.1016/B978-0-08-029384-4.50027-410.1016/B978-0-08-029384-4.50027-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11095910.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110959 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11282510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112825 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10855310.1016/j.matdes.2020.108553 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10779510.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107795 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10911610.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109116 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.17810.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.178 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10907510.1016/j.tws.2022.109075 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2019.05.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.08910.1016/j.ceramint.2022.12.089 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10111710.1016/j.coco.2022.101117 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.021 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.08.00110.1016/j.ceramint.2016.08.001 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20210465910.1002/adma.202104659 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.05410.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.054 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04802.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04802.x ↗
23. 10.1007/s10443-018-9712-210.1007/s10443-018-9712-2 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11143910.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111439 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11034910.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110349 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11224710.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112247 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10921-020-00737-710.1007/s10921-020-00737-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.02.22110.1016/j.jmrt.2025.02.221 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2920410.1002/pc.29204 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10852610.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108526 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.10741010.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.107410 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11307510.1016/j.tws.2025.113075 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1703040110.3390/polym17030401 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11214710.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112147 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.11135510.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111355 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.09.02210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.09.022 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11145910.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111459 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10876210.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108762 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11699410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116994 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11187810.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111878 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11065010.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110650 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10854310.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108543 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.11222010.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112220 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.03.05610.1016/j.tws.2019.03.056 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10955010.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109550 ↗
46. 10.1016/0005-1098(75)90044-810.1016/0005-1098(75)90044-8 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10784410.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107844 ↗
48. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2007.02153.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2007.02153.x ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11415010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114150 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.03310.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.033 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.005 ↗