Study on Hygrothermal Aging of Glass Fiber/Epoxy Composites Fabricated From Dual‐Axis Warp‐Knitted and Flat‐Weave Woven Prepregs
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study innovatively developed biaxial warp‐knitted glass fiber/epoxy prepregs using a hot‐melt process and systematically compared them with conventional plain‐woven prepregs of identical specifications. Under 85°C/100% RH hygrothermal aging conditions, the prepreg‐derived composites exhibited distinct degradation behaviors: The biaxial prepreg composites showed 9.5% higher initial tensile strength (508.8 MPa vs. 464.6 MPa) but greater moisture absorption (6.10% vs. 5.50%), resulting in lower strength retention after 800‐h aging (43.5% vs. 55.4%). DMA analysis revealed a more significant glass transition temperature reduction in biaxial prepreg composites. SEM observations demonstrated that the open architecture of biaxial prepregs accelerated interfacial degradation, while the tight weave structure of plain‐woven prepregs effectively hindered moisture penetration. This work provides critical guidance for selecting prepreg architectures in humid environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Materials and Textile Engineering, Jiaxing University Jiaxing Zhejiang China
NMG Composites Co., Ltd Jiaxing Zhejiang China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.56158/jpte.2023.22.2.0110.56158/jpte.2023.22.2.01 ↗
2. 10.1002/pse.20510.1002/pse.205 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.00110.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-030-72200-5_110.1007/978-3-030-72200-5_1 ↗
5. 10.1177/0021998321101153210.1177/00219983211011532 ↗
6. 10.3390/polym1321372110.3390/polym13213721 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2926110.1002/pc.29261 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2903510.1002/pc.29035 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12571010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125710 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.004 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2859110.1002/pc.28591 ↗
12. 10.1080/09276440.2024.230354310.1080/09276440.2024.2303543 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2781610.1002/pc.27816 ↗
14. 10.1002/pat.623910.1002/pat.6239 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.10588110.1016/j.istruc.2024.105881 ↗
16. Zhou M. · 2013
17. 10.1002/pc.2760710.1002/pc.27607 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2870710.1002/pc.28707 ↗
19. Impact of Carbon Fiber Reinforcement on the Performance of IPN‐Based Elliptical Leaf Springs
20. 10.1002/pc.2893810.1002/pc.28938 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2870710.1002/pc.28707 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2800610.1002/pc.28006 ↗
23. Kotteesvaran B. · 2024
24. 10.1177/1528083723120116710.1177/15280837231201167 ↗
25. 10.1515/cls-2022-020910.1515/cls-2022-0209 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2836610.1002/pc.28366 ↗
27. 10.1177/1528083723120339910.1177/15280837231203399 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2897910.1002/pc.28979 ↗
29. Preparation of Multiaxial Glass Fiber/Epoxy Prepreg and Its Mechanical Properties in Composites
30. 10.1080/00405000.2020.180927010.1080/00405000.2020.1809270 ↗
31. 10.1177/1528083721101547710.1177/15280837211015477 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10865910.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108659 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.11111910.1016/j.engfracmech.2025.111119 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10810110.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108101 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2800310.1002/pc.28003 ↗
36. 10.1007/s12221-024-00781-410.1007/s12221-024-00781-4 ↗