Inspiration of repass in‐situ tempering engineering strategy for shape‐performance integrated manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) thermoplastic composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Advancing in‐situ forming manufacturing techniques for green recyclable thermoplastic composite (TPC) remains a challenge. Herein, the effects of a laser‐assisted repass annealing treatment on the surface roughness, porosity, crystallinity, mechanical properties, and warpage deformation of carbon fiber‐reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) composites were investigated in this work. Specifically, four methods of laminate manufacturing were implemented: no repass, single repass, double repass, and opposite single repass. It is found that the repass treatment enhances surface smoothness of the laminate, promoting resin fusion and reducing the occurrence of pores. Simultaneously, the close‐packed CFs arrangement within the laminate hinders crystal growth, and the crystalline region undergoes rapid melt and crystallization during the repass procedure. Additionally, reducing the porosity and implementing a repass treatment led to a 405.41% increase in PEEK molecular chain diffusion time, thereby enhancing the mechanical properties of the laminate. Meanwhile, the double repass treatment reduced warpage deformation by 20.83%. This can be explained as the repass treatment supports the de‐orientation behavior of PEEK molecular chains, which leads to a reduction in residual stresses and the suppression of warpage deformation defects. In summary, this work validates the feasibility of repass annealing treatment and inspires the birth and development of a potential optimization process for TPC in‐situ forming. Highlights The mechanism of the effect of the repass consolidation process on the warpage‐deformation, porosity, crystallinity, and mechanical properties was revealed. Optimized method for calculating warpage‐deformation using CMM technology. The repass treatment reduced residual stresses and suppressed warpage by promoting molecular chain de‐orientation. This work validates the feasibility of ICAT repass treatment and inspires the inception and development of a potential optimization process for ICAT.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an China
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore
State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an China
Western China Science and Technology Innovation Harbour Xi'an China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.clet.2021.10027210.1016/j.clet.2021.100272 ↗
2. Group J, Estin, Co · 2020
3. 10.1002/pc.2566310.1002/pc.25663 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.07010.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.070 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10966010.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109660 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2630110.1002/pc.26301 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.03.01610.1016/j.optlaseng.2015.03.016 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10944810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109448 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.03510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.035 ↗
10. Ghiorse SR · 1991 · 91
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10616010.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106160 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1312195110.3390/polym13121951 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10807710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108077 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10874510.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108745 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11253910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112539 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0231886210.1007/BF02318862 ↗
20. HoaS ShadmehriF SimpsonJ El‐GeuchyM.Effect of manufacturing parameters on the quality of thermoplastic composites made by Automated fiber placement (AFP). 21st International Conference on Composite Materials Xi'an: ICCM2017.
21. 10.1080/20550340.2018.144453510.1080/20550340.2018.1444535 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10717910.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107179 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12457310.1016/j.polymer.2022.124573 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.4817510.1002/app.48175 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00144-610.1016/S0266-3538(02)00144-6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11725810.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117258 ↗
27. Hoang MD · 2015
28. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00009-910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00009-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10759210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107592 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.003 ↗
31. 10.1067/mpr.2002.12517910.1067/mpr.2002.125179 ↗
32. Inherent relationship between process parameters, crystallization and mechanical properties of continuous carbon fiber reinforced PEEK composites. Defence
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10938110.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109381 ↗
34. Wijskamp S · 2005
35. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.12.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2006.12.005 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11340-009-9228-710.1007/s11340-009-9228-7 ↗
37. 10.3390/polym1206136810.3390/polym12061368 ↗