Tensile behavior of angle ply carbon reinforced PPS laminates under severe thermal aggressions: Homogeneous and heterogeneous temperature conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study explores the effects of critical temperature conditions on carbon fiber‐reinforced Poly Phenylene Sulfide (PPS) laminates, focusing on the coupling between thermal and mechanical behaviors. The thermo‐mechanical behavior of angle‐ply laminates is examined under both homogeneous (thermal decomposition and deformation/damage) and heterogeneous (fire) conditions following three primary objectives: (i) Investigate the impact of temperature distribution on the formation of porosities within the composite, considering their significance in thermal transfer and stress concentration—(ii) Evaluate the changes in residual mechanical behavior and properties under tension due to thermally‐induced damage—(iii) Improve the understanding of the interactions between severe thermal exposures and the mechanical behavior. X‐ray tomographic analyses and tensile tests were conducted to achieve these goals. Porosities resulting from thermal damage are identified as a key factor affecting the structural integrity of C/PPS laminates for high‐temperature applications. Mechanical testing reveals that the porosity content significantly reduces the tensile properties (axial stiffness and strength). Under homogeneous temperature conditions, the decrease in the tensile properties is significant up to T onset (465°C) from which both the axial strength and stiffness dramatically decrease by −75 and −50%, respectively. As exposed to a kerosene flame during 60 s, corresponding to an aggression of 115 kW/m 2 on one face of the laminates, the retention of the residual tensile properties remains good (−12% and −22% in stiffness and strength respectively), despite the dramatic decomposition of the polymer matrix. This can be explained from the stress redistribution from the exposed to the back face, and from the role of thermal insulator played by porosities. Highlights Carbon fibers/PPS laminates were subjected to severe thermal aggressions The formation of thermally‐induced porosities is studied A homogeneous aggression significantly decrease the tensile properties (−75%) Once the PPS matrix is severely decomposed, the load transfer is not possible After a 60 s flame exposure, the retention of tensile properties is good (−20%)
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Normandie Université, UNIROUEN, INSA Rouen, CNRS, Groupe de Physique des Matériaux St Etienne du Rouvray France
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. ISO 2685:1998.Environmental test procedure for airborne equipment — Resistance to fire in designated fire zones.1998.
2. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.04.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.04.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10904610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109046 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.10329010.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103290 ↗
5. Mouritz AP · 2006
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10758610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107586 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11478610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114786 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.08610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.086 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10672010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106720 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.04610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.046 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.05910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.059 ↗
12. 10.2514/6.2002-288710.2514/6.2002-2887 ↗
13. 10.1002/978111997546510.1002/9781119975465 ↗
14. BrowneTNA.A Model for the Structural Integrity of Composite Laminates in Fire. PhD doctoral dissertation University of Newcastle upon Tyne.2006.
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.004 ↗
16. SorathiaU.Flammability and fire safety of composite materials. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Composite Materials for Offshore Operations. Houston TX 26–28 October 1993. 309–17.
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.00210.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.04.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2007.04.013 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11024410.1016/j.matdes.2021.110244 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.023 ↗
21. 10.2514/1.4506510.2514/1.45065 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11080710.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110807 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.10286810.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102868 ↗
25. Test standard EN 6035 Aerospace series—Fibre‐reinforced plastics—Test Method.Determination of notched and unnotched tensile strengthPublished by the European Association of Aerospace Industries (AECMA).1996.
26. FullerJ WisnomMR.Damage suppression in thin ply angle‐ply carbon/epoxy laminates. 19h International Conference on Composite Materials ICCM19 July 28–August 2 Montreal Canada.2013.
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.006 ↗
28. Petermann J · 2004
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.09.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2007.09.014 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10716510.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107165 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11102610.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111026 ↗