journal article·2024-01-20Open access

A new parameter to describe crippling strength: Experimental and theoretical investigations for post‐buckling behaviors of the composite structures

Emine Gülşah Yıldırım, Rahmi Ünal

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract The post‐buckling strength, which is simply called as crippling, is investigated for laminated composite structures in this study. L profiles that had various stacking sequences of carbon fiber reinforced epoxies were tested. Three different layups configurations were used by changing flange‐to‐thickness ratios. The main objective of this research was to show that flange‐to‐thickness ratio was not the only effecting parameter for crippling. Therefore, a new parameter, EGY number, was developed by considering the positions of 0° and 45° plies. Depending on EGY number, a new semi‐empirical formulation was presented to calculate crippling strength of the laminated composite structures. One of the test results was employed to verification of EGY number. In addition, the test results were validated with finite element analyses. Static, Riks and Dynamic, Explicit computational results were compared to simulate the experiments. Highlights Determination of crippling strength both experimentally and theoretically. Comparison of numerical models: Static, Riks versus Dynamic, Explicit. Developing a new parameter called as EGY number. Developing of a new analytical semi‐empirical formula for crippling strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Department Gazi University Ankara Turkey

Turkish Aerospace Industries, Inc. Ankara Turkey

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Stability of structures: Elastic, Inelastic, Fracture, and Damage Theories
2. 10.1007/s10443-017-9583-y10.1007/s10443-017-9583-y ↗
3. 10.1007/s13272-018-0321-410.1007/s13272-018-0321-4 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1305113810.3390/ma13051138 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.06810.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.068 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.acme.2019.03.00810.1016/j.acme.2019.03.008 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11235610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112356 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11644610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116446 ↗
9. 2002
10. 10.1002/978047097270010.1002/9780470972700 ↗
11. YıldırımEG ÜnalR.The effects of thickness and stacking sequence on crippling phenomenon for laminated composite structures. InProceedings of 10th International Conference on Recent Advances in Air and Space Technologies RAST.2023:1‐4.10.1109/RAST57548.2023.10197969 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tws.2014.02.00310.1016/j.tws.2014.02.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.04.02510.1016/j.jcsr.2019.04.025 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.12.00410.1016/j.jcsr.2018.12.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10710810.1016/j.tws.2020.107108 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11038110.1016/j.tws.2022.110381 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0232505510.1007/BF02325055 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00018-610.1016/S0950-0618(01)00018-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.19710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.197 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11070810.1016/j.tws.2023.110708 ↗
21. 10.1177/00219983920260070310.1177/002199839202600703 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.008 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2423910.1002/pc.24239 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2460110.1002/pc.24601 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11210410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112104 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11326910.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113269 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2592110.1002/pc.25921 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11045010.1016/j.tws.2022.110450 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.1029710.1002/pc.10297 ↗
30. 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00009-810.1016/S1359-8368(99)00009-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00272-910.1016/S0045-7949(02)00272-9 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.tws.2009.04.01110.1016/j.tws.2009.04.011 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11000510.1016/j.tws.2022.110005 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11684810.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116848 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.01710.1016/j.commatsci.2014.03.017 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.05910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.01.059 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2588610.1002/pc.25886 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10674710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106747 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11755110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117551 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11388410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113884 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.35510.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.355 ↗
42. Load eccentricity of compressed composite Z‐columns in non‐linear state
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.10210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.102 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11365010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113650 ↗
45. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00005-810.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00005-8 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.tws.2016.06.01810.1016/j.tws.2016.06.018 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.009 ↗
48. Empirical crippling analysis of graphite/epoxy laminated plates
49. 10.1007/s11012-019-01067-310.1007/s11012-019-01067-3 ↗
50. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00026-310.1016/S1359-835X(99)00026-3 ↗
51. 10.3390/ma1519693810.3390/ma15196938 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11281010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112810 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11047510.1016/j.tws.2022.110475 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11618410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116184 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.01.03310.1016/j.tws.2017.01.033 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.10883910.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108839 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11348010.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113480 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
59. Mixed‐mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials
60. 10.1016/0020-7683(84)90055-610.1016/0020-7683(84)90055-6 ↗
61. 10.1177/00219983750090040410.1177/002199837500900404 ↗