journal article·2025-11-10

Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Multi‐Wrinkle Fiber Defects on the Compressive Testing of Unidirectional Composites

Yongshan Li, Xuefeng Li, Jingran Ge, Jun Liang

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wrinkle defects have a significant effect on the mechanical characteristics of composites. Therefore, understanding the impact of these defects is crucial for the prudent usage of composite materials. Both unidirectional (UD) composites with single wrinkles of varied sizes embedded at various locations and multi‐wrinkle composites with different numbers of wrinkles at multiple positions were created in this study. The digital image correlation (DIC) measurement method was used to examine the material's compressive testing. The impacts of wrinkle location, size, and quantity on the materials' failure processes and compressive testing are methodically compared and summarized in this work. Delamination is identified as the primary failure mode, and the wrinkle region of the wrinkled specimens consistently experiences the highest strain. In contrast to their relatively small impact on compressive modulus, wrinkle amplitude, amount, and placement considerably affect compressive strength and failure mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Advanced Structure Technology Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing China

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Buragohain M. K. · 2007
2. 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.04410.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.044 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11076210.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110762 ↗
4. 10.1177/073168441876598110.1177/0731684418765981 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.008 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.04610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.046 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11749810.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117498 ↗
8. 10.1080/15376494.2023.2210.1080/15376494.2023.22 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.029 ↗
11. The Effects of Marcel Defects on Composite Structural Properties
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.01210.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.012 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.007 ↗
14. Talreja R. · 2024
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.08610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.086 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.07.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.024 ↗
18. 10.1016/0266‐3538(96)00045‐010.1016/0266‐3538(96)00045‐0 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.06210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.05.062 ↗
20. 10.1177/0892705794007003010.1177/08927057940070030 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.02.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.02.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11610710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116107 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11654110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116541 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1310242210.3390/ma13102422 ↗
25. 10.1177/0021998315612510.1177/00219983156125 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.03410.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.034 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10652610.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106526 ↗
28. C. A.CiminiandS. W.Tsai “Ply Waviness on In‐Plane Stiffness of Composite Laminates ” Proceedings of the 12th ICCM Paris France 7–9 1999.
29. 10.1520/STP14509S10.1520/STP14509S ↗
30. 10.1007/s13272‐015‐0161‐410.1007/s13272‐015‐0161‐4 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.016 ↗
32. 10.1177/00219983114298710.1177/002199831142987 ↗