Understanding the compaction behavior of uncured thermoset prepreg: Experimental investigation and theoretical analyses
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The deformation behavior of uncured thermoset prepreg during hot compaction process was investigated by dividing the whole compaction process into an initial compression stage and the subsequent creep stage. At the compression stage, there existed a strain‐softening phenomenon in the temperature range of 50–90°C, indicating different deformation behavior that is mainly determined by the viscosity of prepreg. Following an appraisal of advantages and limitations of existing compaction models, a combination model consisted of a modified power‐law model including the influence of temperature and the generalized Kelvin‐Voigt model was proposed to describe the deformation behavior of prepreg during compression and creep stage, respectively. Finally, a discussion on the compaction mechanism was conducted to offer some insights into the deformation process. Highlights Strain‐softening phenomenon occurred during the compaction of uncured prepreg. Proposed combination model captures the deformation of uncured prepreg well. The percolation mechanism dominates prepreg deformation during compaction. The squeeze flow mechanism causes limited thickness reduction of prepreg.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Composites Science Innovation (InCSI), School of Materials Science and Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou PR China
Department of Technical Engineering Huarui Aerospace Manufacturing Co., Ltd Hangzhou PR China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.11798510.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117985 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11052010.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110520 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.est.2024.11093110.1016/j.est.2024.110931 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1421476810.3390/polym14214768 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.406258110.1115/1.4062581 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12289-023-01784-x10.1007/s12289-023-01784-x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.31610.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.316 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.010 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2044410.1002/pc.20444 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10722910.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107229 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2603710.1002/pc.26037 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199831666568110.1177/0021998316665681 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2635110.1002/pc.26351 ↗
14. Lab‐scale experimental analysis of the cyclic compaction‐recovery characteristics of uncured thermoset prepreg
15. 10.1177/00219983870210020710.1177/002199838702100207 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0005843410.1007/BF00058434 ↗
17. 10.1177/07316844980170040210.1177/073168449801700402 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.75008010610.1002/pc.750080106 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.75008020910.1002/pc.750080209 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2000410.1002/pc.20004 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.06.00410.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.06.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.01910.1016/j.mechmat.2016.02.019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10642510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106425 ↗
24. 10.3389/fmats.2022.86458410.3389/fmats.2022.864584 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00143-310.1016/S1359-835X(00)00143-3 ↗
26. 10.1177/00219983920260100910.1177/002199839202601009 ↗
27. 10.1177/095440541141181710.1177/0954405411411817 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.002 ↗
29. 10.1142/S175882511850019910.1142/S1758825118500199 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10671810.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106718 ↗
31. 10.1177/09673911150230060410.1177/096739111502300604 ↗
32. 10.1002/pen.76033210510.1002/pen.760332105 ↗
33. 10.1002/pen.76009041010.1002/pen.760090410 ↗
34. 10.1002/pen.76027020810.1002/pen.760270208 ↗
35. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac703a10.1088/2053-1591/ac703a ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10631510.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106315 ↗
37. Lukaszewicz DHJA · 2011 · 114
38. 10.1177/073168440810298210.1177/0731684408102982 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10567210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105672 ↗
40. XiongH HamilaN BoisseP.Modelling and simulation of the consolidation behavior during thermoplastic prepreg composites forming process. Proceedings of the 20th International Esaform Conference on Material Forming (Esaform 2017).20171896.10.1063/1.5008019 ↗
41. 10.1080/00405000.2010.51510310.1080/00405000.2010.515103 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11601610.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116016 ↗
43. 10.1533/9780857090430.1.310.1533/9780857090430.1.3 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10667710.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106677 ↗