Determination of optimum production and 3D printer application temperatures for hemp fiber reinforced polycarbonate composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study delves into optimizing production parameters and 3D printing (3Dp) conditions for alkaline‐treated 10% hemp fiber‐reinforced polycarbonate (PC) composites. Initially, composite filaments were extruded at 250°C (PCH250) and 230°C (PCH230) to assess the impact of varying melt mixing temperatures on thermal behavior. Thermal characterization was conducted using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). DSC analysis indicated consistent glass transition temperatures (Tg) across pure PC and the composites, while TGA revealed minimal thermal degradation in PCH230 compared to pure PC. Subsequently, to ascertain the optimal 3D printing temperature, specimens were printed at temperatures elevated by 10°C relative to their melt mixing temperatures (PCH250/260 and PCH230/240), followed by mechanical evaluation via tensile testing. PCH230/240 exhibited superior mechanical properties, demonstrating a 12% increase in tensile strength and a 29% increase in Young's modulus compared to pure PC. Additional testing at 230°C printing temperature (PCH230/230) demonstrated enhanced mechanical strength over PCH250/260 but inferior performance relative to PCH230/240, attributed to incomplete interlayer adhesion observed through SEM analysis. Consequently, the optimal composite melt mixing temperature was determined to be 230°C, with an accompanying 3D printing temperature of 240°C for optimal mechanical performance. Highlights 3D printable, 5% NaOH treated hemp fiber reinforced polycarbonate composite. Printing composite with 3D printing device at different temperatures 230°C process temperature gives the best thermal properties. 240°C 3Dp temperature provides the best mechanical and morphological properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture Kocaeli University, Architecture and Design Faculty Kocaeli Turkey
Department of Chemical Engineering Kocaeli University, Engineering Faculty Kocaeli Turkey
Polymer Science and Technology Programme Kocaeli University Kocaeli Turkey
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3311/pp.ar.2007‐2.0610.3311/pp.ar.2007‐2.06 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym1212304810.3390/polym12123048 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.01810.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.018 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.03110.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.031 ↗
5. 10.2307/j.ctv13xpsvw.1310.2307/j.ctv13xpsvw.13 ↗
6. 10.3390/polym1209200010.3390/polym12092000 ↗
7. HoogendoornM BlokA TeuffelR.Bio‐based composite pedestrian bridge. Part 2: materials and production process. Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium.2016.
8. DahyH.Towards sustainable buildings with free‐form geometries: development and application of flexible NFRP in load‐bearing structures. In Biocomposite Materials: Hameed Sultan MT Majid MSA Jamir MRM Azmi AI Saba N (Eds).Design and Mechanical Properties Characterization. Composites Science and Technology Springer Singapore2021;31‐43. doi:10.1007/978‐981‐33‐4091‐6_210.1007/978-981-33-4091-6_2 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1011128610.3390/ma10111286 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1317296410.3390/polym13172964 ↗
11. DžaltoJ MedinaLA MitschangP.Processing of high performance biocomposites for the use in the European building industry. 20th International Conference on Composite Materials.2015.
12. 10.1007/s42107‐021‐00398‐510.1007/s42107‐021‐00398‐5 ↗
13. 10.3390/buildings903006410.3390/buildings9030064 ↗
14. Could 3D printing change the world? Technologies, potential, and implications of additive manufacturing
15. 10.1007/s11465‐013‐0248‐810.1007/s11465‐013‐0248‐8 ↗
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.667.25010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.667.250 ↗
17. 10.1002/mame.20170021910.1002/mame.201700219 ↗
18. 10.3390/polym1107109410.3390/polym11071094 ↗
19. 10.1080/15623599.2015.101213610.1080/15623599.2015.1012136 ↗
20. 3D concrete printing in architecture a research on the potential benefits of 3D concrete printing in architecture
21. 10.1080/21650373.2019.170519910.1080/21650373.2019.1705199 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.2517310.1002/app.25173 ↗
23. 10.1108/RPJ‐11‐2017‐024210.1108/RPJ‐11‐2017‐0242 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.05110.1016/j.polymer.2017.06.051 ↗
25. 10.1080/17452759.2016.127449010.1080/17452759.2016.1274490 ↗
26. 10.1590/S1516‐1439200900030001410.1590/S1516‐14392009000300014 ↗
27. 10.1002/j.1941‐9635.2016.tb01538.x10.1002/j.1941‐9635.2016.tb01538.x ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2497110.1002/pc.24971 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.00110.1016/j.addma.2015.02.001 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11668‐014‐9803‐910.1007/s11668‐014‐9803‐9 ↗
31. 10.14314/polimery.2022.3.410.14314/polimery.2022.3.4 ↗
32. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.862.17410.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.862.174 ↗
33. 10.1007/s40436‐019‐00287‐w10.1007/s40436‐019‐00287‐w ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13280810.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132808 ↗
35. 10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
36. 10.3390/polym1419397610.3390/polym14193976 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1411311110.3390/ma14113111 ↗
38. 10.1002/pat.452410.1002/pat.4524 ↗
39. 10.3390/jcs101000810.3390/jcs1010008 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00103‐910.1016/S0266‐3538(03)00103‐9 ↗
41. 10.3390/jcs101000710.3390/jcs1010007 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.005 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.04910.1016/j.indcrop.2019.04.049 ↗
44. 10.3390/polym1510227110.3390/polym15102271 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13451710.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134517 ↗
46. 10.1080/15440478.2021.194148810.1080/15440478.2021.1941488 ↗
47. 10.2478/amm‐2013‐018610.2478/amm‐2013‐0186 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.39710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.397 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.005 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.00110.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.001 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10891110.1016/j.matdes.2020.108911 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.04110.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.041 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10570‐024‐05904‐x10.1007/s10570‐024‐05904‐x ↗
54. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.02710.1016/j.indcrop.2017.07.027 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.09.02610.1016/j.indcrop.2013.09.026 ↗
56. 10.1007/s12221‐013‐0389‐810.1007/s12221‐013‐0389‐8 ↗
57. 10.1080/15440478.2021.187535910.1080/15440478.2021.1875359 ↗
58. Mechanical properties of hemp fibers and hemp/PP composites: effects of chemical surface treatment
59. 10.1002/app.2941210.1002/app.29412 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10924‐020‐01756‐110.1007/s10924‐020‐01756‐1 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.024 ↗
62. 10.3390/polym1403048110.3390/polym14030481 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.033 ↗
64. 10.1080/1023666X.2012.71852710.1080/1023666X.2012.718527 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.008 ↗
66. 10.1002/app.4053410.1002/app.40534 ↗
67. 10.1007/s12221‐014‐2607‐410.1007/s12221‐014‐2607‐4 ↗
68. 10.1002/pc.2534510.1002/pc.25345 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.05510.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.055 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.10810.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.108 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.00110.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.001 ↗