Effect of polymer crosslinking to the failure behavior of thermoplastic composite remelting interface: Molecular dynamics simulation and experimental verification
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The forming interface is the weak link of thermoplastic composite complex structures. To explore the effect of polymer crosslinking on the failure behavior of thermoplastic composite remelting interface using “Preforming + Remelting bonding” process, the all‐atom models of different types of interfaces were established, and a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was conducted on the uniaxial tensile failure process of the remelting interface. The failure behavior of the remelting interface with different preforming processes was tested to verify the correctness of MD simulation, and the influencing mechanism of polymer crosslinking reactions in the preforming stage to the remelting interface properties was clarified. The results showed that the yield stress of the uncrosslinked interface reaches 283.2 MPa and 16.0% and 50.6% higher than that of the unilateral and bilateral crosslinked interfaces respectively. The polymer crosslinking reaction during the preforming stage will reduce the interlaminar bonding performance. The interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of the uncrosslinked interface is 87.46 MPa and 7.21% and 27.36% higher than that of the unilateral and bilateral crosslinked interface respectively, and only 3.95% lower than that of the non‐remelting sample formed by standard process. This research provides a new approach for predicting and analyzing the effect of polymer crosslinking on remelting interface properties of thermoplastic composite using “Preforming + Remelting bonding” process. Highlights The failure behavior of different thermoplastic composite remelting interfaces was studied. MD simulation was conducted on the uniaxial tensile failure process of the remelting interface. The influencing mechanism of polymer crosslinking reactions in the preforming stage to the remelting interface properties was clarified. It is effective to explore the failure mechanism of thermoplastic remelting interface by MD simulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical and Energy Engineering Zhejiang University of Science and Technology Hangzhou China
State Key Laboratory of Precision Manufacturing for Extreme Service Performance Central South University Changsha China
Zhejiang Innuovo Rehabilitation Devices Co. Ltd. Zhejiang China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/0892705723115853610.1177/08927057231158536 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym.1502041510.3390/polym.15020415 ↗
3. 10.1177/0892.705723122282010.1177/0892.7057231222820 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199831.667179610.1177/002199831.6671796 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.007 ↗
6. 10.1007/s13726‐020‐00836‐210.1007/s13726‐020‐00836‐2 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.500801910.1063/1.5008019 ↗
8. 10.3390/polym1501016510.3390/polym15010165 ↗
9. 10.1177/073168441983807010.1177/0731684419838070 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10687010.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106870 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2662510.1002/pc.26625 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.10820710.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108207 ↗
13. 10.1177/095400832090376810.1177/0954008320903768 ↗
14. 10.1002/app.5216610.1002/app.52166 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2788510.1002/pc.27885 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2460010.1002/pc.24600 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma.1306128410.3390/ma.13061284 ↗
18. 10.1002/app10.1002/app ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10605410.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106054 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10648910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106489 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2569310.1002/pc.25693 ↗
22. 10.1177/0954008321105158510.1177/09540083211051585 ↗
23. ZhouZ.Study on Degradation Mechanism of PEEK during Melting and the Improvement of its Melting Stability. 2012. PhD Thesis Changchun China: Jilin University.
24. 10.1002/prot.34004010610.1002/prot.340040106 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1111176610.3390/polym11111766 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12606210.1016/j.polymer.2023.126062 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1107111610.3390/polym11071116 ↗
28. 10.1002/wcms.134610.1002/wcms.1346 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12291510.1016/j.polymer.2020.122915 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.08.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2018.08.011 ↗
31. 10.1080/09243046.2019.163006910.1080/09243046.2019.1630069 ↗
32. VarshneyV RoyA BaurJ.Modeling the role of bulk and surface characteristics of carbon fiber on thermal conductance across the carbon‐fiber/matrix Interface. 257th National Meeting of the American‐Chemical‐Society (ACS) Orlando.2019257:605.
33. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.14510.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.145 ↗
34. 10.1007/s40034‐023‐00268‐610.1007/s40034‐023‐00268‐6 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.1040610.1002/app.10406 ↗