Investigations on toughening and self‐healing performance of plain woven composites with mendable polymer stitches
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates toughening and self‐healing properties of plain woven composite structure with poly[ethylene‐co‐methacrylic acid] (EMAA) stitches. Firstly, the cantilever beam specimens with different stitched spacing were performed to determine inter‐laminar fracture toughness. Subsequently, the finite element models of EMAA stitched cantilever beam was established to predict the toughening effects based on nonlinear spring and cohesive zone model (CZM). The force‐displacement responds of experimental and simulation results show excellent correlation. Finally, the toughening and healing mechanism of the stitched plain woven structure were explored. Compared with the original specimen, the EMAA stitched structure shows an excellent toughening ability. After heating, the damaged structure was healed through pressure deliver mechanism to restore the interlaminar fracture toughness of the composite. Highlights Thermoplastic EMAA filaments with self‐healing properties were sewn into the woven composite. The EMAA stitched woven composite structure exhibits excellent interlaminar toughening and healing properties. Finite element model combined non‐linear spring and CZM was established to predict the toughening effects. The toughening and self‐healing mechanisms of EMAA stitched plain woven structure were revealed in detail.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical and Power Engineering Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002199831984042710.1177/0021998319840427 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.02.00610.1016/j.coco.2019.02.006 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.06.00710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.06.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.05910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.059 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.02310.1016/j.tws.2018.07.023 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10268310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102683 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.cja.2019.08.01610.1016/j.cja.2019.08.016 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11233210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112332 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10795110.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107951 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.043 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1312274010.3390/ma13122740 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.08110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.081 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10118-020-2472-010.1007/s10118-020-2472-0 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2605810.1002/pc.26058 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.10.03110.1016/j.polymer.2015.10.031 ↗
18. 10.1108/AEAT-02-2022-003610.1108/AEAT-02-2022-0036 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.011 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2550710.1002/pc.25507 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.012 ↗
22. 10.1177/1056789522109560910.1177/10567895221095609 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2495310.1002/pc.24953 ↗
24. 10.1080/1478422X.2021.193745110.1080/1478422X.2021.1937451 ↗
25. 10.1108/WJE-12-2019-035910.1108/WJE-12-2019-0359 ↗
26. Effects of emulsifiers on properties of microcapsules as self‐healing composite materials
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2010.08.017 ↗
28. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/11/11500210.1088/0964-1726/23/11/115002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.020 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.11.02110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.11.021 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10753710.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107537 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10659910.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106599 ↗
33. An analysis of the self‐healing and mechanical properties as well as shape memory of 3D‐printed Surlyn® nanocomposites reinforced with multiwall carbon nanotubes
34. 10.1002/pc.2743610.1002/pc.27436 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2734910.1002/pc.27349 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.08.08110.1016/j.carbon.2022.08.081 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2701410.1002/pc.27014 ↗
38. ASTM D5528‐13.Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites.
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11609010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116090 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.04.028 ↗
41. ASTM.D3039M‐14 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials.
42. ABAQUS · 2014
43. 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗