journal article·2024-03-10Open access

Effect of recycled fibers and shredded intermediates variation on the mechanical properties and energy absorption of fiber‐reinforced composite panels

Uday Vaidya, Romeo Sephyrin Fono Tamo, Georges Chahine, Nitilaksha Hiremath, Soydan Ozcan, John Unser, Jay Holmes

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract The global composite industry generates large quantities of waste which mostly ends up in landfills due to a lack of established end‐use applications for multiple waste streams. The scrap from end‐of‐life (EoL) includes manufacturing waste such as dry chopped fiber tows, loose fibers, shredded fibers from fabric textile operations, cured/semi‐cured prepregs, and fully cured composite structure waste from aircraft, automobiles, wind blades, boats, and pressure vessels. In this work, different composite waste streams were reduced to shredded intermediates, followed by simple blending, and subjected to wet compression molding to produce composite panels. The panels/plaques were tested for mechanical properties (flexure and impact), fiber‐matrix wet‐out, and property bounds. It was found that wet‐compression molding was a viable and scale‐able approach to produce recycled panels from EoL composites shredded scrap. Furthermore, full‐scale size panels for use in truck bodies and intermodal shipping container flooring were manufactured and their impact resistance was tested using a drop weight impact test. They were tested both for high‐ and low‐velocity load. In the case of high‐velocity load, the average impact load was 14,673 N; the average absorbed energy was 101.6 J; the average elastic energy was 11.7 J and the impact resistance was 1065 J/m. In the case of the low‐velocity drop weight impact test, it was found that the average impact load was 7877.358 N; the average absorbed energy was 9.718 J; the average elastic energy was 9.14 J, and the impact resistance was 184.1 J/m. The shredded composite was shown to be a candidate material for the manufacture of truck bodies and intermodal containers’ flooring panels. Highlights By using shredded intermediates from different composite waste streams, it is possible to manufacture composite panels. Wet–compression process is an appropriate technique for manufacturing recycled fiber composite panels. Regardless of the source of scrap, the mechanical properties of the produced composite panels were improved. The recycling process technology can be transformed to commercial scale to produce full‐size transportation flooring panels. A product pathway is established in consideration of lower cost and improved recyclability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Biomedical Engineering The University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA

Manufacturing Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee USA

Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI) The Composites Institute Knoxville Tennessee USA

Greentex Greenville South Carolina USA

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. CutlerD BlackB.Wind turbine blade recycling has “tons” of potential.2020). Accessed January 10 2023https://www.epri.com/about/media‐resources/press‐release/4qCpMWmQT0OIxrBeKL4azJ
2. Cai Z · 2010
3. 10.1177/002199831772421410.1177/0021998317724214 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.02610.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.026 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.01910.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.019 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11431‐016‐9028‐710.1007/s11431‐016‐9028‐7 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.01310.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.013 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.00410.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.004 ↗
9. 10.1021/sc500174m10.1021/sc500174m ↗
10. 10.1080/0959333030938559910.1080/09593330309385599 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.011 ↗
12. FrancisS.The State of Recycled Carbon Fiber Composites World.2019Accessed August 3 2022.
13. 10.1007/s42452‐020‐2195‐410.1007/s42452‐020‐2195‐4 ↗
14. 10.3390/jcs404016110.3390/jcs4040161 ↗
15. Life cycle assessment of PU composite shipping container floors compared to conventional wood flooring
16. How many shipping containers are out there.2023Accessed January 10 2023.https://porta-stor.com/many-shipping-containers/
17. COA report reveals increased use of bamboo for container floors. Container owners association published on January 31 2014. Accessed January 9 2023.
18. Rich D · 2011
19. 10.1088/1757-899X/842/1/01200610.1088/1757-899X/842/1/012006 ↗
20. HolmesJ VaidyaU HiremathNH UnserJ.Multiple stream low‐cost recycling method IACMI011‐2022/6.27 Final Technical Report PA16‐0349‐6.27‐01.2022.
21. 10.3390/ma1011128510.3390/ma10111285 ↗
22. State of the composites industry report for 2017
23. 10.1016/j.triboint.202210.1016/j.triboint.2022 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.10010.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.100 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.05010.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.050 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10852510.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108525 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.025 ↗
28. 10.1002/pen.2641910.1002/pen.26419 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2744510.1002/pc.27445 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.2638810.1002/pen.26388 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2737110.1002/pc.27371 ↗
32. 10.1002/pls2.1005510.1002/pls2.10055 ↗
33. 10.1002/vnl.2200810.1002/vnl.22008 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2688010.1002/pc.26880 ↗
35. 10.1177/002199830505111110.1177/0021998305051111 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0263‐8223(98)00080‐410.1016/S0263‐8223(98)00080‐4 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2733110.1002/pc.27331 ↗
38. 10.5714/CL.2017.21.02310.5714/CL.2017.21.023 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.92510.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.925 ↗