journal article·2024-03-10Open access

Acoustic absorption of 3D printed glycol‐modified polyethylene terephthalate composites with organically modified montmorillonite and short carbon fibers: Experimentation and ANN based predictive strategy

Vinyas Mahesh

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract In this article, the acoustic properties of 3D printed glycol‐modified polyethylene terephthalate (PETG) reinforced with organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT) nanoclay/short carbon fiber (SCF) nanocomposites are experimentally investigated using ASTM E1050‐08 standard. To this end, the sound absorption coefficient (SAC) of different PETG composites was calculated with the aid of two microphone impedance tube, working in the frequency range of 50–6300 Hz. The effect of different weight percentages (wt%) of OMMT nanoclay, SCFs, and 3D printing infill density on the acoustic behavior of PETG nanocomposites is studied. The experimental results reveal that higher wt% of OMMT nanoclay and SCFs has a beneficial effect on sound absorption. Further, the trend of variation of SAC is justified with morphological studies. Also, an artificial neural network (ANN) based prediction methodology to predict SAC is developed using the datasets obtained from the experimentation. Levenberg–Marquardt backward propagation algorithm with 20 neurons trains the ANN model. Using the trained ANN model, the acoustic properties of PETG/OMMT/SCF nanocomposites with different operating frequencies, infill density and wt% of reinforcements are predicted with less than 5% average error. This can be beneficial in eliminating the fabrication and experimentation costs incurred while assessing the acoustic properties of the PETG composites. Highlights PETG/OMMT nanoclay/SCF composite filaments are fabricated. Acoustic absorption of 3D printed PETG composites are experimentally studied. ANN based predictive tool is developed using experimental data. ANN tool predicts the sound absorption and reduces experimentation cost. Microstructural studies justify the trend of sound absorption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Smart Materials for Construction · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering City, University of London London UK

Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Silchar Silchar Assam India

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1006/jsvi.1996.007810.1006/jsvi.1996.0078 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.rineng.2020.10011410.1016/j.rineng.2020.100114 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rineng.2020.10013610.1016/j.rineng.2020.100136 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.10.00710.1016/j.apacoust.2018.10.007 ↗
5. Coir fibre reinforcement and application in polymer composites
6. Bell L · 1994
7. 10.1007/s11837-017-2730-y10.1007/s11837-017-2730-y ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10738810.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107388 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10934-022-01219-z10.1007/s10934-022-01219-z ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.10826410.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108264 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0460510.1021/acsomega.1c04605 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10965-022-03246-510.1007/s10965-022-03246-5 ↗
13. 10.1177/073168441562004610.1177/0731684415620046 ↗
14. 10.1177/0967391121105116410.1177/09673911211051164 ↗
15. 10.1177/089270571245486410.1177/0892705712454864 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00289-022-04295-y10.1007/s00289-022-04295-y ↗
17. 10.1080/15376494.2019.170043310.1080/15376494.2019.1700433 ↗
18. 10.1080/15376494.2023.226210610.1080/15376494.2023.2262106 ↗
19. Improvement in sound insulation performance of pyramidal truss core cylindrical sandwich structure by adding a frame structure
20. Effect of truss core on sound radiation behavior of sandwich plate structures under structure borne excitation
21. 10.1080/15376494.2022.208534810.1080/15376494.2022.2085348 ↗
22. 10.1080/15376494.2023.217657610.1080/15376494.2023.2176576 ↗
23. 10.1080/15376494.2021.199554910.1080/15376494.2021.1995549 ↗
24. 10.1080/15376494.2022.208189010.1080/15376494.2022.2081890 ↗
25. Manufacturing of membrane acoustical metamaterials for low frequency noise reduction and control: a review
26. 10.1080/15376494.2023.223769910.1080/15376494.2023.2237699 ↗
27. 10.1007/s40436-021-00357-y10.1007/s40436-021-00357-y ↗
28. 10.1080/15376494.2018.153416310.1080/15376494.2018.1534163 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.10845710.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108457 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.03210.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.032 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.12.03010.1016/j.apacoust.2018.12.030 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.10724410.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107244 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.10430410.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104304 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10198410.1016/j.addma.2021.101984 ↗
35. 10.3390/polym1205106210.3390/polym12051062 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10756110.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107561 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10976610.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109766 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.29110.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.291 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.80910.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.809 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.79710.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.797 ↗
41. 10.1002/pc.2598510.1002/pc.25985 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2616310.1002/pc.26163 ↗
43. 10.1002/pc.2620110.1002/pc.26201 ↗
44. 10.1177/0892705722114782610.1177/08927057221147826 ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.2733710.1002/pc.27337 ↗
46. 10.1177/0731684423118885310.1177/07316844231188853 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.5408910.1002/app.54089 ↗