Void content of polypropylene/carbon fiber wet‐laid nonwoven composites: Effect of fiber content and molding conditions, and void elimination mechanism
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Various wet‐laid nonwoven composites have been well‐developed in recent decades. However, studies that systematically investigate the factors affecting the void content of wet‐laid nonwoven composites are still missing. This paper aims to study the factors affecting the void content of wet‐laid nonwoven composites and propose a mechanism for void elimination in wet‐laid nonwoven composites. Polypropylene (PP) and carbon fiber (CF) were chosen to manufacture PP/CF wet‐laid nonwoven composites. An orthogonal experimental design found that the CF content and molding pressure can dominate the void content while molding temperature and time have non‐significant effects. Subsequently, this paper proposed that the void elimination mechanism is the compression of the impregnated CF network and the trapped air (compression mechanism) instead of the matrix's infiltration to the dry CF network (infiltration mechanism). In order to validate the compression mechanism, we developed an analytical model for predicting the void content of the PP/CF wet‐laid nonwoven composites. Good agreement between the predicted and the experimental void content suggests that void elimination follows the compression mechanism. Highlights An orthogonal experimental design reveals that the CF content and molding pressure can dominate the void content of the PP/CF wet‐laid nonwoven composite, while molding temperature and time have non‐significant effects. A mechanism (i.e., compression mechanism) is proposed to explain the effect of CF content and molding conditions on the void content of the PP/CF wet‐laid nonwoven composite. Good agreement between the experimental and the predicted void content validates the compression mechanism.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Light Industry and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper South China University of Technology Guangzhou China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Wet laying nonwoven using natural cellulosic fibers and their blends: process and technical applications. A review
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10593910.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105939 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10559810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105598 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12221-020-9622-410.1007/s12221-020-9622-4 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12221-021-1465-010.1007/s12221-021-1465-0 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10965-021-02730-810.1007/s10965-021-02730-8 ↗
7. Haowen WeiHL NagatsukaW OhsawaI et al.Systematic comparison between carding and paper‐making method for producing discontinuous recycled carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics. 20th International Conference on Composite Materials.2015.
8. 10.1002/pc.75010030210.1002/pc.750100302 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.75014010510.1002/pc.750140105 ↗
10. Lu Y · 2002
11. Caba AC · 2005
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.004 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12221-018-8279-810.1007/s12221-018-8279-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.007 ↗
15. HonmaM TsuchiyaA HiranoN HashimatoT.Novel carbon‐fiber‐reinforced stampled thermoplastic sheet with high strength. 18th International Conference on Composite Materials.2011.
16. 10.1080/09243046.2017.133427410.1080/09243046.2017.1334274 ↗
17. 10.1080/09243046.2018.152041710.1080/09243046.2018.1520417 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.2036910.1002/app.20369 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.017 ↗
20. Christina FroemderKK ReynoldsN WilsonPR FernandesFC StuartR.Coles investigation of the processabilityof hybrid thermoplastic nonwoven including recycled carbon fibre through fast stamping. SAMPE Europe Conference.2018.
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.024 ↗
22. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-A10.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-A ↗
23. 10.3390/aerospace504012010.3390/aerospace5040120 ↗
24. 10.1177/09673911180260030610.1177/096739111802600306 ↗
25. 10.1177/00219980177266227110.1177/002199801772662271 ↗
26. 10.1177/00219980177266228010.1177/002199801772662280 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.28110.1016/j.procir.2017.03.281 ↗
28. 10.3390/jcs503008610.3390/jcs5030086 ↗
29. 10.1177/004051752098721210.1177/0040517520987212 ↗
30. 10.1177/00219983990330080610.1177/002199839903300806 ↗
31. 10.1177/0021998322112901610.1177/00219983221129016 ↗
32. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00061-510.1016/0266-3538(95)00061-5 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.289590610.1115/1.2895906 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.1053910.1002/pc.10539 ↗
35. 10.1002/pen.1030410.1002/pen.10304 ↗
36. 10.1122/1.55046010.1122/1.550460 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10668210.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106682 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10853-013-7323-810.1007/s10853-013-7323-8 ↗
39. 10.1177/073168441453888010.1177/0731684414538880 ↗
40. Improving the interfacial shear strength of polypropylene/carbon fiber nonwoven composite by three different methods