Time‐dependent properties of high‐density polyethylene with wood/graphene nanoplatelets reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effect of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) on the long‐term performance of wood fiber/high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) composite is investigated by using short‐term creep tests with an efficient, faster data analysis approach. Previously, it was shown that the addition of GNPs at 15 wt% into HDPE reduces the viscoplastic (VP) strain developed during 2 h creep by ~50%. The current study shows that 25 and 40 wt% wood content in HDPE reduce the VP strains developed during 2 h creep time by >75% with no noticeable effect of the increased wood content. However, further addition of GNPs results in more than 90% total reduction in the VP strains. The current study shows that the development of the VP strains in the hybrid composites follows Zapas model. Viscoelastic (VE) response of these composites is nonlinear and thus is described by Schapery's model. Parameters for VP and VE models are obtained from the creep experiments and were validated in a separate loading‐unloading test sequence. Results show a very good agreement between experiments and predictions for the studied materials as long as the micro‐damage is not present.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Materials Science Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology Luleå Sweden
Department of Structural Engineering Riga Technical University Rīga Latvia
Division of Machine Elements Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology Luleå Sweden
Funding
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · European Regional Development Fund
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00226-011-0458-310.1007/s00226-011-0458-3 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.1011110.1002/pc.10111 ↗
3. 10.1039/c5ra19224b10.1039/c5ra19224b ↗
4. 10.1007/BF0073927210.1007/BF00739272 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10703110.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.107031 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10777810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107778 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11749910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117499 ↗
8. A.Amiri C. A.Ulven.Durability of flax fiber bio‐composites Conf. 66th Flax Institutes United States 2016.
9. V.Placet O.Cisse V.Guicheret‐Retel F.Trivaudey L.Boubakar.Viscoelastic behaviour of single hemp fibre under constant and cyclic humidity environment ‐ Experiment and modelling ICCM Int. Conf. Compos. Mater. 2015.
10. 10.1515/secm.2004.11.2-3.20110.1515/secm.2004.11.2-3.201 ↗
11. 10.1177/152808371985231210.1177/1528083719852312 ↗
12. 10.1177/089270571142584610.1177/0892705711425846 ↗
13. Marcovich N. E. · 2008
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.05010.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.050 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.1173810.1002/app.11738 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2460210.1002/pc.24602 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1309208910.3390/ma13092089 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.03.04710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.03.047 ↗
19. 10.3390/polym1108136510.3390/polym11081365 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10854-017-6364-110.1007/s10854-017-6364-1 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10740010.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107400 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.028 ↗
23. 10.1504/IJAUTOC.2015.07056810.1504/IJAUTOC.2015.070568 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.5078310.1002/app.50783 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.006 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2575810.1002/pc.25758 ↗
27. 10.1002/pen.2439510.1002/pen.24395 ↗
28. 10.1016/B978-0-7204-2369-3.50004-710.1016/B978-0-7204-2369-3.50004-7 ↗
29. 10.1002/pen.76009041010.1002/pen.760090410 ↗
30. 10.1177/00219983710050020610.1177/002199837100500206 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.015 ↗
32. L.Pupure.Non‐linear model applied on composites exhibiting inelastic behavior: development and validation Luleå University of Technology 2015.
33. 10.1177/09636935150240060110.1177/096369351502400601 ↗
34. 10.1166/jbmb.2015.151727310.1166/jbmb.2015.1517273 ↗
35. Group NanoXplore. “heXo‐G V Product Datasheet”2016.
36. Z.Al‐Maqdasi.Multifunctionality and durability of cellulosic fiber reinforced polymer composites Luleå University of Technology 2022.
37. 10.1002/app.4782110.1002/app.47821 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2642210.1002/pc.26422 ↗
39. A.Pegoretti H.Mahmood D.Pedrazzoli K.Kalaitzidou.Improving fiber/matrix interfacial strength through graphene and graphene‐oxide nano platelets in IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016.10.1088/1757-899X/139/1/012004 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2409710.1002/pc.24097 ↗
41. 10.3390/ma606248310.3390/ma6062483 ↗
42. Gong G. · Plast. Rubber Compos. · 2013 · 42
43. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.010 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.023 ↗
45. 10.1002/slct.20210083110.1002/slct.202100831 ↗
46. 10.1002/APP.4995710.1002/APP.49957 ↗
47. Varna J. · 2010
48. 10.1016/0032-3861(84)90267-210.1016/0032-3861(84)90267-2 ↗
49. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102601-4.00016-310.1016/B978-0-08-102601-4.00016-3 ↗
50. 10.1007/s11029-013-9330-x10.1007/s11029-013-9330-x ↗
51. 10.1177/002199831557943510.1177/0021998315579435 ↗
52. 10.1007/s11043-016-9311-210.1007/s11043-016-9311-2 ↗