journal article·2025-07-10Open access

Enhanced electromagnetic shielding and thermal performance of GNP and boron nitride infused carbon fiber/PDMS composites through magnetic field‐induced GNP alignment

Gandluri Parameswarreddy, Harshitha Kolukula, Hisayuki Suematsu, Asapu Vinaya Kumar, Venkatachalam Subramanian, Ramanujam Sarathi, Rishi Verma, Archana Sharma

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 10

Abstract

Abstract The present work is focused on the development of magnetic field‐assisted graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) alignment in boron nitride (BN) graded short carbon fiber/ PDMS composites for the enhancement of thermal, electrical properties and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness in X‐band (8–12 GHz) frequency which can be used as a gasket material. A rotating magnetic field is used for the alignment of GNP in the polymer matrix while the sample is in the curing stage. Initially, BN filler is optimized using morphological study viz., x‐ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. It has been validated that BN with 3 wt% is an optimum filler loading having a better filler dispersion and higher filler orientation. Extending the study further on this optimized BN filler (3 wt%) in the composite, the paper also analyzes the influence of filler orientation. Electrical properties by I‐V characteristics, thermal properties by performing laser flash analysis, and thermography analysis are carried out. It is observed that the electrical and thermal conductivities are greatly influenced by the alignment of filler. The lateral alignment of filler (RMF‐L) samples has a uniform heat distribution and better heat transfer all over the sample. In addition, the RMF‐L sample has an enhancement of EMI shielding of 53.3 dB (i.e., 99.9995% attenuation) compared to the non‐oriented NMF sample with 45.3 dB. In summary, the lateral alignment of filler in the RMF‐L sample led to the efficient use of nanofiller in the application of EMI shielding with better thermal and electrical properties. Highlights GNP is oriented using a rotating magnetic field for enhancement of properties. Additionally, neighbor BN to GNP aligns with the GNP alignment force. BN of 3 wt% filler is an optimum filler loading with GNP maximum alignment. GNP alignment has a great influence on electrical and thermal properties. The aligned GNP sample RMF‐L has better EMI shielding of 53.3 dB.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering IIT Madras Chennai India

Department of Electrical Engineering NIT Andhra Pradesh Tadepalligudem India

Extreme Energy‐Density Research Institute Nagaoka University of Technology Nagaoka Japan

Microwave Laboratory, Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai India

Pulsed Power and Electromagnetic Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Visakhapatnam India

Funding

Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences · Indian Institute of Technology Madras · Science and Engineering Research Board

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. HanadaE AntokuY TaniS et al.Electromagnetic Interference on Medical Equipment by Low‐Power Mobile Telecommunication Systems.2000.10.1109/15.902316 ↗
2. 10.21303/2461‐4262.2020.00139810.21303/2461‐4262.2020.001398 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11664‐020‐07979‐110.1007/s11664‐020‐07979‐1 ↗
4. 10.1109/TEMC.2020.302004910.1109/TEMC.2020.3020049 ↗
5. Gandluri Parameswarreddy st Rao Yadam th Yugandhara Verma th Rishi Understanding the Shielding Effectiveness of Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced MWCNT/Epoxy Composite on Electromagnetic Interference Induced by Partial Discharges.2023.10.23919/ISEIM60444.2023.10329184 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2668410.1002/pc.26684 ↗
7. 10.1002/bem.2192510.1002/bem.21925 ↗
8. YaoY JinS ZouH et al.Polymer‐Based Lightweight Materials for Electromagnetic Interference Shielding: A Review. doi:10.1007/s10853‐020‐05635‐x
9. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2022.11709510.1016/j.synthmet.2022.117095 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10637610.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106376 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2792810.1002/pc.27928 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.05.01210.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.05.012 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1323425810.3390/polym13234258 ↗
15. KhanS ScholzD OrdonezJS StieglitzT.PDMS gasket underfill for long‐term insulation of high‐density interconnections in active implantable medical devices.2018doi:10.1109/EMBC.2018.851288410.1109/EMBC.2018.8512884 ↗
16. 10.1039/d1ma00365h10.1039/d1ma00365h ↗
17. 10.1007/s11696‐022‐02406‐710.1007/s11696‐022‐02406‐7 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0250410.1021/acsomega.2c02504 ↗
19. ZecchiS CristoforoG BartoliM et al.A comprehensive review of electromagnetic interference shielding composite materials. doi:10.3390/mi1502018710.3390/mi15020187 ↗
20. JiangD MurugadossV WangY et al.Electromagnetic interference shielding polymers and nanocomposites: A review. doi:10.1080/15583724.2018.154673710.1080/15583724.2018.1546737 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11856910.1016/j.carbon.2023.118569 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2718510.1002/pc.27185 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.01.12410.1016/j.carbon.2021.01.124 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10854‐021‐06900‐810.1007/s10854‐021‐06900‐8 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2706210.1002/pc.27062 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.026 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.02610.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.026 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.5454110.1002/app.54541 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym1005054210.3390/polym10050542 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00397‐017‐1042‐z10.1007/s00397‐017‐1042‐z ↗
31. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.10125110.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101251 ↗
32. 10.1177/0021998323117206310.1177/00219983231172063 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.04510.1016/j.cej.2017.01.045 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11091610.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110916 ↗
35. 10.1039/c6ra07657b10.1039/c6ra07657b ↗
36. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.320402810.1109/ACCESS.2022.3204028 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2818410.1002/pc.28184 ↗
38. 10.1063/5.014589510.1063/5.0145895 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.03510.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.035 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0445610.1021/acsnano.0c04456 ↗
41. DasNC KhastgirD ChakiTK ChakrabortyA.Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon black and carbon fibre filled EVA and NR based composites. [Online]. Available:www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesa
42. 10.1002/pc.2113310.1002/pc.21133 ↗
43. 10.1007/s10854‐020‐03963‐x10.1007/s10854‐020‐03963‐x ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.05010.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.050 ↗
45. 10.1002/pc.2664910.1002/pc.26649 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0165610.1021/acsomega.3c01656 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.4816210.1002/app.48162 ↗
48. 10.1088/1361‐6528/aab24310.1088/1361‐6528/aab243 ↗
49. 10.1002/slct.20230479010.1002/slct.202304790 ↗
50. 10.1007/s42452‐018‐0115‐710.1007/s42452‐018‐0115‐7 ↗
51. 10.1039/c5ra14105b10.1039/c5ra14105b ↗