Fast prediction of curing residual stress in polymer‐matrix composites by a deep learning method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Curing residual stress (CRS) is common in polymer‐matrix composites due to the anisotropic properties of materials. Finite element method (FEM), the most extensively used approach for curing behavior prediction, is usually complicated and time‐consuming. To achieve a fast prediction of process‐induced stresses, a convolutional neural network (CNN) is established based on the FEM. Firstly, a fully coupled methodology is built and validated through distortions of experimentally manufactured laminates. Then, it is applied to generate models with different stacking layers, and the residual stress is computed and serves as the dataset of the deep learning model. Finally, the construction and hyperparameters are determined, and the good generalization performance proves the high accuracy of the current model. Besides, the CNN method (<1 s) greatly reduces the computational time compared with the FEM (>14 min). The supervised machine learning method shows great potential in promoting efficiency in stacking sequence designing and optimization of composites. Highlights A fully coupled model was built to predict the curing behavior of composites. The numerical model was validated by the deformation of unsymmetrical composites. A FEM‐CNN method was proposed for the fast prediction of curing residual stress. Compared with FEM, this machine learning method is accurate and efficient.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic System, School of Mechanical Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Zhejiang Province School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
State‐Owned Wuhu Machinery Factory Wuhu China
Shanghai Institute of Satellite Engineering, Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology Shanghai China
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-023-11647-z10.1007/s00170-023-11647-z ↗
2. 10.1177/0021998321106654510.1177/00219983211066545 ↗
3. 10.1177/00219980303105710.1177/002199803031057 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2593410.1002/pc.25934 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10565210.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105652 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.001 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00419-017-1340-z10.1007/s00419-017-1340-z ↗
8. 10.1007/s11340-009-9280-310.1007/s11340-009-9280-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.01510.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.07510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.075 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.009 ↗
12. 10.1177/00219983920260050210.1177/002199839202600502 ↗
13. Johnston AA · 1997
14. 10.1106/YXEA-5MH9-76J5-BACK10.1106/YXEA-5MH9-76J5-BACK ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11604210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116042 ↗
16. 10.1080/1075941980894589710.1080/10759419808945897 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.006 ↗
19. 10.1115/1.318591010.1115/1.3185910 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10409-023-22438-x10.1007/s10409-023-22438-x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11198010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111980 ↗
23. 10.1002/pat.515210.1002/pat.5152 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11534110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115341 ↗
25. 10.3390/fib902000810.3390/fib9020008 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10443-021-09891-110.1007/s10443-021-09891-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.09610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.096 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11134010.1016/j.matdes.2022.111340 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11113210.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111132 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13678310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136783 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.00910.1016/j.ndteint.2012.07.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10278610.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102786 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.11046210.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110462 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10850910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10985010.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109850 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.12484910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124849 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10984410.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109844 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11737010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117370 ↗
39. 10.1177/00219983910250030210.1177/002199839102500302 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10443-019-09762-w10.1007/s10443-019-09762-w ↗
41. 10.1002/polb.1987.09025091410.1002/polb.1987.090250914 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2505910.1002/pc.25059 ↗
43. 10.1177/002199831990030010.1177/0021998319900300 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11415010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114150 ↗
45. 10.1177/00219983690030030210.1177/002199836900300302 ↗
46. 10.1177/00219983670010020810.1177/002199836700100208 ↗
47. SanthanamV MorariuVI DavisLS.Generalized deep image to image regression.2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE; 2017:5395–5405.10.1109/CVPR.2017.573 ↗
48. ThakkarV TewaryS ChakrabortyC.Batch Normalization in Convolutional Neural Networks—A comparative study with CIFAR‐10 data.2018 Fifth International Conference on Emerging Applications of Information Technology (EAIT). 2018:1–5.10.1109/EAIT.2018.8470438 ↗
49. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization
50. 10.1007/s12541-014-0350-910.1007/s12541-014-0350-9 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11409610.1016/j.cma.2021.114096 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cma.2019.11279010.1016/j.cma.2019.112790 ↗