journal article·2024-08-10

Experimental investigation on the influence of self‐heating effect on the fatigue behavior of aluminum‐ CFRP riveted‐bonded hybrid joints

Huaping Wu, Jianhui Song, Lingyu Yue, Xiaochen Yu, Yingdan Zhu

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The self‐heating‐induced temperature rise in the adhesive layer under fatigue loading plays a significant role in influencing the fatigue behavior of riveted‐bonded hybrid joints in aluminum‐carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite structures. This study aims to investigate the impact of the self‐heating effect on the fatigue life of such hybrid joints. Experimental analysis was conducted to explore the interrelationships between temperature evolution and fatigue behavior at varying frequencies, adhesive thicknesses, and loading levels. Additionally, a theoretical model for predicting self‐heating temperature rise in hybrid joints with different parameters was developed. Results show that the self‐heating effect is notably affected by loading frequency, loading level, and adhesive thickness. The theoretical model accurately captures temperature variations and predicts critical frequencies for hybrid joints under different loading levels, which are identified as 10, 8, 3, and 1 Hz for loading levels of 35%, 40%, 50%, and 60%, respectively. Critical adhesive thicknesses ranging from 0.5 to 1 mm were also determined. Furthermore, the study predicts the fatigue life at specific self‐heating temperatures with an average error within 4%, offering valuable theoretical insights for evaluating the fatigue safety performance of hybrid joints and facilitating optimization strategies. Highlights The interrelationship between the self‐heating effect and fatigue behavior was revealed. Quantitative influences of main process parameters on the self‐heating effect were discussed. A self‐heating temperature rise model considering process parameters was developed. The critical frequency and adhesive thickness of the hybrid joint were determined.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering Zhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou China

Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing Equipment Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences Ningbo China

Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10303010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103030 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2744810.1002/pc.27448 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1602056810.3390/ma16020568 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10330410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103304 ↗
5. 10.1177/073168441562729610.1177/0731684415627296 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.006 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2736510.1002/pc.27365 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11549010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115490 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10889710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108897 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10298410.1016/j.tafmec.2021.102984 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.10.01310.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.10.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10673810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106738 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10294310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.102943 ↗
15. A study on the effects of nanostructure reinforcement on the failure load in adhesively bonded joints after the subjected to fully reversed fatigue load
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10717710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107177 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.07810.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.078 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10247710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102477 ↗
19. 10.1177/0021998321102569010.1177/00219983211025690 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10697110.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106971 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym1424538410.3390/polym14245384 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.2412410.1002/pen.24124 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.014 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10751510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107515 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.012 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10627710.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106277 ↗
27. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab453410.1088/2053-1591/ab4534 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2635510.1002/pc.26355 ↗
29. 10.1177/002199831877704810.1177/0021998318777048 ↗
30. 10.1007/s40430-021-03105-210.1007/s40430-021-03105-2 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.039 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11392510.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113925 ↗
33. ASTM International. ASTM D5687/D5687M‐95 · 2002
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11756110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117561 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10332110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103321 ↗
36. ASTM International. ASTM D5868‐01 · 2014
37. ASTM International. ASTM D1002‐01 · 2020
38. ASTM International. ASTM D3166‐99 · 2020
39. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10250810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102508 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2517610.1002/pc.25176 ↗
41. ASTM International. ASTM Standard D 5573‐99 · 2007
42. 10.1111/ffe.1294910.1111/ffe.12949 ↗
43. 10.1002/pc.2513910.1002/pc.25139 ↗
44. 10.1002/pc.2481010.1002/pc.24810 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.021 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11436710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114367 ↗