Compatibility of high strength silica‐modified microcapsules modified with polydopamine in elastomer substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Microcapsules with polydopamine composite shell layer were successfully synthesized by functionalizing silica‐modified microcapsules containing isophorone diisocyanate. The components and micromorphology of silica‐modified microcapsules at different reaction periods were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy. The structure of different microcapsules was characterized by FTIR, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The mechanical performances of different microcapsules were analyzed by nanoindentation technique. The compatibility and self‐healing efficiency of different microcapsules with the substrate were also investigated by the tensile tests. The results showed that the density of the silica‐modified microcapsule shell gradually increased and the mechanical performances were enhanced with the silica source. The hardness and elastic modulus of silica‐modified microcapsules in suitable core fraction (76.5 wt%) were 139.9 MPa and 2.2 GPa, which are 2.3 times and 4.8 times higher than those of untreated microcapsules, respectively. The functionalized modified microcapsules had excellent compatibility with the elastomeric substrate (PU‐PPG2000). At the same time, the self‐healing efficiency of the functionalized modified microcapsules in PU‐PPG2000 was 69.8%, which was 48.9% higher than that of the untreated microcapsules prepared under the same conditions. Silicon modification improved the density of microcapsules, enhancing their mechanical strength. At the same time, functionalization modification improved the interfacial bonding strength of microcapsules, further improving the compatibility with the polymer matrix. Highlights Microcapsules with different silicon sources are characterized. Microcapsules are functionalized with polydopamine. Individual microcapsules are tested for mechanical strength by nanoindentation. The compatibility of the functionalized microcapsules is excellent. The self‐healing efficiency of modified microcapsules is greater than 70%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Antimicrobial agents and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Coal Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Taiyuan China
School of Chemical Sciences University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/3505723210.1038/35057232 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.06010.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.060 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20170555110.1002/adfm.201705551 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.9b1891910.1021/acsami.9b18919 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.1c1930410.1021/acsami.1c19304 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.01510.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.04.015 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1302032610.3390/ma13020326 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10288010.1016/j.jobe.2021.102880 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.10720410.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.107204 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12547810.1016/j.polymer.2022.125478 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.10663810.1016/j.porgcoat.2021.106638 ↗
12. The experiment study of fracture mechanics on self‐healing composite material containing microcapsules
13. 10.1016/S0890‐6955(02)00265‐110.1016/S0890‐6955(02)00265‐1 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.00810.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.008 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11837‐012‐0436‐810.1007/s11837‐012‐0436‐8 ↗
16. 10.3901/JME.2014.20.02610.3901/JME.2014.20.026 ↗
17. Nanoindenation and nanoscratch measurements to determine the mechanical properties of TiO2 nano films
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.01.06310.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.01.063 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.02810.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.028 ↗
20. 10.1186/s11671‐017‐2426‐910.1186/s11671‐017‐2426‐9 ↗
21. 10.1080/01694243.2020.179864710.1080/01694243.2020.1798647 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1402037010.3390/ma14020370 ↗
23. 10.3365/KJMM.2020.58.3.20710.3365/KJMM.2020.58.3.207 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.33310.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.333 ↗
25. 10.3390/coatings1101002310.3390/coatings11010023 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.15347810.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153478 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.01.01710.1016/j.matlet.2005.01.017 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11431‐010‐4147‐510.1007/s11431‐010‐4147‐5 ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.194‐196.244810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.194‐196.2448 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.07110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.071 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0378‐5173(02)00193‐X10.1016/S0378‐5173(02)00193‐X ↗
32. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.12.01310.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.12.013 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.005 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.04210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.042 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.10524210.1016/j.porgcoat.2019.105242 ↗
36. 10.1126/science.114724110.1126/science.1147241 ↗
37. 10.1002/admi.20170125410.1002/admi.201701254 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0020‐7683(97)00349‐110.1016/S0020‐7683(97)00349‐1 ↗
39. 10.1016/S1359‐6454(01)00295‐610.1016/S1359‐6454(01)00295‐6 ↗
40. 10.1016/0022‐5096(65)90018‐910.1016/0022‐5096(65)90018‐9 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.06310.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.063 ↗
42. 10.1021/ma801718v10.1021/ma801718v ↗
43. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.02.00610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.02.006 ↗
44. 10.1021/bi000243410.1021/bi0002434 ↗
45. 10.1021/la051546810.1021/la0515468 ↗
46. 10.1073/pnas.060555210310.1073/pnas.0605552103 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.03.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.03.010 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.07550510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075505 ↗
49. 10.1002/pc.2685010.1002/pc.26850 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.08410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.084 ↗
51. 10.1177/0731684422110294510.1177/07316844221102945 ↗