journal article·2019-03Open access

Effect of thermally reduced graphene oxides obtained at different temperatures on the barrier and mechanical properties of polypropylene/TRGO and polyamide‐6/TRGO nanocomposites

Moisés Gómez, Alexis Díaz, Paula Reyes, Mehrdad Yazdani‐Pedram, Sônia Marlí Bohrz Nachtigall, Humberto Palza, Raúl Quijada

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue S2

Abstract

Polypropylene (PP) and polyamide‐6 (PA6) nanocomposites containing thermally reduced graphene oxide (TRGO), obtained either at 600°C (TRGO600) or 800°C (TRGO800), were prepared by melt mixing in order to study the effect of the thermal treatments on their barrier and mechanical properties. Transmission electron microscopy images of nanocomposites showed a relative good dispersion of TRGO in polymer matrices with some agglomerations. Differential scanning calorimetry analyses showed a slight reduction in crystallinity for both polymers in the presence of TRGO. The permeability to oxygen and water vapor was decreased in almost all nanocomposites due to a more tortuous path to gas permeation, being more evident for PP/TRGO800. Tensile stress–strain tests showed that all nanocomposites had higher elastic modulus, but PA6/TRGO600 nanocomposites showed better mechanical properties. These findings indicated that TRGO obtained at a higher temperature imparts better barrier and mechanical properties to PP, while TRGO obtained at a lower temperature imparts better barrier and mechanical properties to PA6. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:E1746–E1756, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Graphene research and applications · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas Universidad de Chile Beauchef, 851 Santiago Chile

Departamento de Química Orgánica y Fisicoquímica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmaceúticas Universidad de Chile Sergio Livingstone, 1007 Santiago Chile

Instituto de Química Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Avenida Bento Gonçalves, 9500 Porto Alegre Brazil

Funding

Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico · Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym811038610.3390/polym8110386 ↗
3. 10.1002/pi.490910.1002/pi.4909 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.06.00410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.06.004 ↗
5. 10.1021/ma100572e10.1021/ma100572e ↗
6. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.02610.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.026 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.04210.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.018 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mseb.2016.10.00410.1016/j.mseb.2016.10.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.05.02610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.05.026 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.01810.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.018 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.07910.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.079 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2016.09.023 ↗
14. Allahbakhsh A. · 2017 · 699
15. 10.3390/ma904026210.3390/ma9040262 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mseb.2016.10.00310.1016/j.mseb.2016.10.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.06110.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.06.061 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.06310.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.063 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
20. ASTM E96/E96M‐10. Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 2010 https://doi.org/10.1520/E0096_E0096M‐10.10.1520/E0096_E0096M ↗
21. ASTM D638‐00. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 2002 https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-00.10.1520/D0638-00 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.01810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.02.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.10.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2015.10.006 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.13110.1016/j.cej.2016.09.131 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.10.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.10.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.04610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.046 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tca.2008.12.00310.1016/j.tca.2008.12.003 ↗
28. 10.1021/ma030548110.1021/ma0305481 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.01.03110.1016/j.polymer.2009.01.031 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.3830210.1002/app.38302 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.01710.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.05110.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.051 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.03310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.01.033 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.019 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.01.02710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.01.027 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.02910.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.029 ↗
37. Rallini M. · 2017 · 47
38. 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60116-910.1016/S1005-0302(12)60116-9 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.1049710.1002/pc.10497 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.10.00310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2010.10.003 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.tca.2006.11.00210.1016/j.tca.2006.11.002 ↗