Mechanical and gas barrier properties of polyamides 6/ organically modified montmorillonite/ maleic anhydride grafted polyolefin elastomer composites produced by rotational molding
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract High‐strength and high‐gas‐barrier plastic packaging liners have emerged as competitive products with promising potential application in the field of Type IV hydrogen storage cylinders. Ternary composites, which contain PA6, organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT), and maleic anhydride grafted polyolefin elastomer (POE‐g‐MAH), have been proposed as possible material for this application. To achieve the goal of developing this material, the influence of material formulation on various properties such as mechanical, microstructure, gas barrier, thermal stability, and flow properties of the composites was investigated. The results show that the composites with 3 wt% OMMT had the best gas barrier and mechanical properties. Additionally, the effect of rotational molding process parameters on the wall thickness of the plastic liner was studied. Process parameter regulation methods were proposed to improve wall thickness consistency of the products. The investigation shows that the composites containing 3 wt% OMMT had the best wall thickness consistency of the products. Highlights The effect of filler content on the properties of PA6 composites was investigated. The composites with 3 wt% OMMT had the best wall thickness consistency. The gas barrier property of the composite is improved by 43.9% over virgin PA6. The impact strength of the composite is improved by 133.8% over virgin PA6. Insights for the development of processing methods for plastic packaging inserts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing PR China
State Key Laboratory of Organic‐Inorganic Composites Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing PR China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0924-0136(95)01840-910.1016/0924-0136(95)01840-9 ↗
2. McCourtM KearnsM MartinP ButterfieldJ.A Comparison between Conventional and Robotic Rotational Moulding Machines 34th International Manufacturing Conference.2017107–114.
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10887610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108876 ↗
4. 10.3139/217.255210.3139/217.2552 ↗
5. 10.1002/pen.1048710.1002/pen.10487 ↗
6. Viscous flow of crystalline bodies under the action of surface tension
7. Discussion of ‘seminar on the kinetics of sintering
8. 10.1063/1.172187410.1063/1.1721874 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.169829110.1063/1.1698291 ↗
10. 10.1002/aic.69043121310.1002/aic.690431213 ↗
11. 10.1002/pen.76019130210.1002/pen.760191302 ↗
12. BellehumeurCT.Polymer sintering and its role in rotational molding.1997.
13. The formation and removal of gas bubbles in a rotational moulding grade of PE
14. 10.1002/pen.1150510.1002/pen.11505 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.2561710.1002/pen.25617 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10973-011-1916-810.1007/s10973-011-1916-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10744910.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107449 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10924-020-01667-110.1007/s10924-020-01667-1 ↗
19. 10.1177/0021955X21101379310.1177/0021955X211013793 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2447310.1002/pc.24473 ↗
21. 10.1177/096739112091660210.1177/0967391120916602 ↗
22. 10.1002/pen.2166810.1002/pen.21668 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2349610.1002/pc.23496 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2360010.1002/pc.23600 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2667210.1002/pc.26672 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2544810.1002/pc.25448 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.03110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.031 ↗
28. Practical guide to rotational moulding