Influence of conditioning on the high strain rate compression response of Kevlar thermoplastic composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Kevlar reinforced composite material systems are widely used for personal body armors. Due to aging or minor damage while in service, body armor may get exposed to external weather conditions, including moisture. The present study investigates the effect of moisture on the high strain rate behavior of Kevlar/Polypropylene (K‐PP) composite. Flat K‐PP composite laminate was manufactured using a vacuum‐assisted compression molding followed by laser machining. Dynamic compressive loading tests were performed using split Hopkinson pressure bar setup. The phenomenological modeling approach was adopted to characterize the rate‐dependent behavior of dry and wet composites. For identical dynamic compressive loading, different strain rates, strains, and stresses were attained by the dry and wet composite specimens. Macroscopic and microscopic imaging was done to expose the variation in damage behavior as a function of moisture absorption. Significant property reduction as a function of moisture absorption emphasizes the need for moisture proofing and protecting the armor products from minor damages leading to sites for moisture ingress.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Energetic Materials and Combustion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Delhi New Delhi India
Marie Skłodowska‐Curie Career‐FIT Fellow Irish Center for Composites Research (IComp), School of Engineering, University of Limerick Limerick Ireland
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Hazell P. J. · J Strain Anal · 2016 · 47 · 39610.1177/0309324712448298 ↗
2. Allazadeh M. R. · Adv Mater Sci Appl · 2012 · 1 · 13
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.060 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.05710.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.057 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.08.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.08.014 ↗
6. Kpenyigba K. M. · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2015 · 79 · 8310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.10.007 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.054 ↗
8. Ferreira W. · J. Compos. Mater. · 2020 · 54 · 1
9. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.00510.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.005 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.025 ↗
12. Caliskan U. · Polym. Compos. · 2019 · 41 · 1
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.009 ↗
14. Eslami S. · Adv Mater Sci Eng · 2012 · 2012 · 110.1155/2012/303014 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00017-110.1016/S0266-3538(97)00017-1 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01501-510.1016/S0921-5093(01)01501-5 ↗
17. Haque A. · J. Compos. Mater. · 2003 · 37 · 62710.1177/002199803029732 ↗
18. PS C. · Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng · 2013 · 3 · 116
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.026 ↗
20. Chouhan H. · Procedia Eng · 2017 · 173 · 69410.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.151 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.08.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2016.08.026 ↗
22. Gama B. A. · Appl Mech Rev · 2014 · 57 · 22310.1115/1.1704626 ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-410.1016/0022-5096(63)90050-4 ↗
24. Mukasey M. B. · 2008 · 1
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.11.028 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.01910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.019 ↗
27. Asija N. · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2017 · 19 · 110.1007/s11051-016-3723-4 ↗
28. NaikNK ChV KavalaVR.Hybrid composites under high strain rate compressive loading2008;498:87–99.10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.124 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11661-007-9204-810.1007/s11661-007-9204-8 ↗
30. 10.1177/00219980303518910.1177/002199803035189 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.04010.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.040 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.02610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.06.026 ↗
33. Yokoyama T. · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. · 2015 · 56 · 1310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.07.011 ↗
34. Firdaus M. · Mater. Des. · 2011 · 32 · 420710.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.037 ↗
35. Skrzypek J. J. · 2015 · 5710.1007/978-3-319-17160-9_2 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.04.00110.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.04.001 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.02.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.02.005 ↗
38. Woo S. C. · J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. · 2013 · 48 · 42010.1177/0309324713496084 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00031-910.1016/S0263-8223(01)00031-9 ↗
40. Powers B. M. · Adv. Mater. · 1995 · 48 · 179
41. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00064-710.1016/S0266-3538(02)00064-7 ↗
42. Weeks C. A. · Compos. Sci. Tech. · 1998 · 3538 · 60310.1016/S0266-3538(97)00183-8 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.09910.1016/j.msea.2010.10.099 ↗
44. Greenhalgh E. S. · 2009
45. High strain rate compression testing of intra‐ply and inter‐ply hybrid thermoplastic composites reinforced with Kevlar/basalt fibers10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106407 ↗