Enhancement in Interfacial Adhesion of Ti/Polyetheretherketone by Electrophoretic Deposition of Graphene Oxide
Source abstract
Abstract
This article discusses about the significance of graphene oxide (GO) deposition on the surface of a titanium plate by electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method to improve the adhesive strength of Ti/polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interfacial adhesive. Firstly, the anodic EPD method was applied to a water dispersion solution of GO, and then the morphology and the properties of titanium plate surface were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and contact angle measurements before and after GO deposition. Furthermore, the changes in the properties of GO after heating at 390°C were characterized by Raman and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopies. According to the results of single lap tensile shear test, the adhesion strength of Ti/PEEK interface after the anodization and deposition of GO was 34.94 MPa, an increase of 29.2% compared with 27.04 MPa of sample with only anodization. Also, the adhesion strengths were 58.1 and 76.5% higher compared with the samples of only GO deposited (22.1 MPa) and pure titanium (19.8 MPa), respectively. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:E1243–E1251, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Material Science and Technology Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 29 Yudao St., Nanjing 210016, Nanjing China
College of International Education Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics 29 Yudao St., Nanjing 210016, Nanjing China
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Chester, Thornton Science Park, Pool Lane Chester CH2 4NU UK
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.056 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.05.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2007.05.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.03610.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.036 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12239-009-0006-410.1007/s12239-009-0006-4 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.07610.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.076 ↗
6. 10.3390/polym602037010.3390/polym6020370 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.06.00410.1016/j.corsci.2013.06.004 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.04310.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.043 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.10010.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.100 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.04410.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.044 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2314810.1002/pc.23148 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2343610.1002/pc.23436 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.06210.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.062 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.01710.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.016 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2314810.1002/pc.23148 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.012 ↗
20. 10.1088/1742-6596/352/1/01200310.1088/1742-6596/352/1/012003 ↗
21. 10.1021/nn102152x10.1021/nn102152x ↗
22. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
23. 10.1088/1757-899X/139/1/01200410.1088/1757-899X/139/1/012004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.04.00810.1016/j.polymer.2016.04.008 ↗
25. 10.1038/nnano.2014.24810.1038/nnano.2014.248 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.01.05010.1016/j.cplett.2009.01.050 ↗
27. 10.1163/15685610432274699210.1163/156856104322746992 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.09.01010.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.09.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.00610.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.006 ↗
30. 10.1177/095400831770154910.1177/0954008317701549 ↗