journal article·2019-04

Understanding the fundamental properties of epoxy molybdenum disulfide nanocomposites

Nagachandrika Peddamallu, Krishnamurthy Sridharan, Tadachika Nakayama, Ramanujam Sarathi

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The surface discharge inception voltage (SDIV) of epoxy MoS2 nanocomposite is high under DC voltage compared to AC voltages. It is also observed that SDIV increases up to 0.5 wt% of MoS2 added epoxy resin and above which a marginal reduction in SDIV is observed. Surface charge accumulation is less with epoxy nanocomposite compared with epoxy resin. With increase in percentage of MoS2, complete reduction in charge retention time is observed. Surface roughness measurement with the surface discharge caused damage zone with epoxy nanocomposites indicate that surface roughness is less when the percentage of MoS2 is increased and above certain weight percentage, the surface roughness is almost same. Epoxy nanocomposites show a marginal increase in contact angle with increase in weight percentage of molybdenum disulfide. LIBS studies indicate that the crater depth and the plasma temperarure measured is low for epoxy nanocomposites with 0.5 wt% MoS2. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:1556–1563, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600036 India

Extreme Energy Density Research Institute, Nagaoka University of Technology Nagaoka, Niigata Prefecture 940‐2188 Japan

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Tanka T. · Advanced Nano dielectrics, Pan Stanford, New York · 2017
2. 10.1021/nn501409810.1021/nn5014098 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00289-016-1693-410.1007/s00289-016-1693-4 ↗
4. 10.1049/PBED009E10.1049/PBED009E ↗
5. K.Pohlink E.Mikes I.Huet T.Gigleux L. T. J.Luc BessèdeM. CIGRE Paris France 27 August–1 Sept Paper No. B3–302(2006).
6. 10.1109/TDEI.2004.134978810.1109/TDEI.2004.1349788 ↗
7. T.Imai F.Sawa T.Nakano T.Ozaki T.Shimizu S.Kuge M.KozakoandT.Tanaka IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP) Nashville Tennessee USA October 16–19 171(2005).
8. 10.1109/TEC.2005.85374510.1109/TEC.2005.853745 ↗
9. R.TremblayandC.Hudon Proceedings of Iris Rotating Machine Conference San Antonio TX 6 (2007).
10. 10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444673910.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446739 ↗
11. 10.1080/15583724.2017.130966210.1080/15583724.2017.1309662 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20110396510.1002/adma.201103965 ↗
13. 10.1039/C5TA01720C10.1039/C5TA01720C ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.5b0076210.1021/acsami.5b00762 ↗
15. 10.1109/TDEI.2013.00412410.1109/TDEI.2013.004124 ↗
16. Animesh S. · polym.Compos. · 2017 · 33
17. 10.1109/MEI.2005.141221410.1109/MEI.2005.1412214 ↗
18. Centurioni L. · IEEE Electr. Insul. Conf. · 2002 · 371
19. Crank J. · 1975
20. 10.1039/C3NR05815H10.1039/C3NR05815H ↗
21. 10.1109/TDEI.2011.573945310.1109/TDEI.2011.5739453 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.6b0149110.1021/acsami.6b01491 ↗
23. 10.1109/TDEI.2013.663370710.1109/TDEI.2013.6633707 ↗
24. 10.1109/T-DEI.2008.444674910.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446749 ↗
25. 10.1039/C3RA45947K10.1039/C3RA45947K ↗
26. 10.1088/0022-3727/37/6/01210.1088/0022-3727/37/6/012 ↗