journal article·2017-05

Effects of liquid absorption and swelling on the permeability of natural fiber fabrics in liquid composite moulding

Yingdan Zhu, Jing Cai, Yongli Qin, Dong Liu, Chun Yan, Hongsheng Zhang

Polymer Composites· Volume 38· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Liquid composite moulding (LCM) has been successfully used to manufacture natural fiber reinforced composites. Effects of liquid absorption and swelling on the permeability of natural fiber fabrics in LCM were investigated. It shows that the saturated permeability measured in the corn syrup is 23.1%–69.5% smaller than that in the motor oil because of reduced porosity and flow paths caused by liquid absorption and swelling. Based on traditional models by considering the effects of liquid absorption and swelling of jute fibers, a mathematic model was developed to predict the variable permeability during the mold filling. Experimental results demonstrate excellent agreement with the prediction. The effects of flow rate and fiber volume fraction on permeability were also analyzed. It is found that liquid absorption and swelling may dominate the permeation when the flow rate is low while the flow rate may contribute more when it is large. Furthermore, fiber volume fraction is more sensitive to permeability in the syrup than is the case in the motor oil because of the absorption and swelling of natural fibers. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:996–1004, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Robotics and Intelligent Manufacturing Equipment Technology Ningbo Institute of Material Technology & Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences Ningbo 315201 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Ningbo Natural Science Foundation

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.01510.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.015 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.1020610.1002/pc.10206 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2116510.1002/pc.21165 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2105510.1002/pc.21055 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.07.023 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2271610.1002/pc.22716 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2046110.1002/pc.20461 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2214510.1002/pc.22145 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.04010.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.040 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.010 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2273610.1002/pc.22736 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2246310.1002/pc.22463 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2113610.1002/pc.21136 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.021 ↗
19. Li Y. · Compos. Sci. Technol., · 2000 · 60 · 1271
20. 10.1023/A:102658340489910.1023/A:1026583404899 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.05610.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.056 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.05010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.050 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.09.00210.1016/j.paerosci.2013.09.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.012 ↗
28. 10.1177/00405175580280100610.1177/004051755802801006 ↗
29. Mantains G.I. · Cellulose · 1995 · 2 · 110.1007/BF00812768 ↗
30. Rahman M.S. · Cell. Chem. Technol. · 1997 · 136 · 271
31. Greenkorn R.A. · 1983
32. Masoodi R. · Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. · 2010 · 56 · 225710.1002/aic.12163 ↗
33. Bird R.B. · 1975
34. 10.1002/aic.1132210.1002/aic.11322 ↗