Mechanical characterization and modeling of poly (β‐hydroxybutyrate)‐co‐poly(β‐hydroxyvalerate)–Alfa fiber‐reinforced composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical properties of biobased composites of poly(β‐hydroxybutyrate)‐co‐poly(β‐hydroxyvalerate) biopolymer continuously reinforced with unidirectional Alfa fibers are investigated via tensile testing of oriented composite laminates. Simple mechanical models for the elastic stiffness, strength, and nonlinear hardening of the biobased composites are proposed with an emphasis on techniques that only require the independent properties of the fiber and matrix to facilitate composite design. Rule of mixtures (ROM) approaches are found to effectively predict the elastic properties of the composites but generally overestimate strength. Modified ROM approaches that discount the contribution of the matrix in the fiber loading direction and the contribution of the fiber in the transverse loading direction provide the most accurate strength predictions. Apparent elastic properties for composites with varying fiber orientations are predicted using a modified orthotropic laminate plate method which was found to overestimate composite stiffness in off‐axis loading directions. Postyield nonlinear hardening is modeled using a calibrated continuum yield and plasticity model and demonstrated to provide a close match of the experimental results. POLYM. COMPOS., 35:1758–1766, 2014. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Université Tunis El Manar, Ecole Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Tunis, Campus El Manar 1002 Tunis Tunisia
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University Stanford California
Funding
EPA STAR Fellowship
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jsfa.255810.1002/jsfa.2558 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.009 ↗
3. Srubar W.V. · Int. J. Environ. Cult. Econ. Soc. Sustain. · 2011 · 7 · 157
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.012 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-005-3143-910.1007/s10853-005-3143-9 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10924-005-2944-x10.1007/s10924-005-2944-x ↗
7. Strong A.B. · 1993
8. 10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
9. EPA Recover Your Resources Reduce Reuse and Recycle Construction and Demolition Materials at Land Revitalization Projects 2003[cited 2012 February 10th] Available at:http://epa.gov/brownfields/tools/cdbrochure.pdf.
10. Christian S.J. · 2009 · 219
11. Materials‐Sciences‐Corporation · 2000
12. Cuendo A. · 1954 · 234
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.006 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.019 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.013 ↗
16. 10.1002/marc.1989.03010020110.1002/marc.1989.030100201 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.04.01110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.04.011 ↗
18. ASTM · 2008
19. B.I.Tianan ENMAT Injection Molding Grade Y1000P Technical Data Sheet 2008.
20. 10.1201/978142004520810.1201/9781420045208 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb06852.x ↗
22. 10.1177/002199830934184710.1177/0021998309341847 ↗
23. 10.1016/0956-7151(95)00003-E10.1016/0956-7151(95)00003-E ↗
24. 10.1520/STP44701S10.1520/STP44701S ↗
25. 10.1115/1.342368810.1115/1.3423688 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
27. 10.1177/00219983890230100410.1177/002199838902301004 ↗
28. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90057-A10.1016/0266-3538(92)90057-A ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0055069610.1007/BF00550696 ↗