journal article·2025-02-10Open access

Material properties of spray‐dried cellulose nanocrystal reinforced homopolymer polypropylene composites

Xueqi Wang, Pixiang Wang, Shaoyang Liu, Justin Crouse, Douglas J. Gardner, Brian Via, Tom Gallagher, Thomas Elder, Yucheng Peng

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract Spray‐dried cellulose nanocrystal (SDCNC) particles have attracted intense interest as reinforcements in polymer composites because of their unique physical and mechanical properties. This work aims to develop homopolymer polypropylene (HPP) composites with different loading levels of SDCNC particles (5, 10, 15, and 30 wt%) to understand their impact on composite mechanical, morphological, and thermal properties. The SDCNC‐reinforced HPP composites were manufactured using a C.W. Brabender bowl internal mixer with a masterbatch concept and an injection molding process. The mechanical, morphological, and thermal properties of the composites were investigated. Compared to pure HPP, the tensile, and flexural modulus of elasticity (MOE) of composites with 30 wt% SDCNC significantly increased by up to 67% and 49%. The impact strength of the composites with the absence of a compatibilizer significantly increased by up to 19%, which was attributed to the mechanical interlocking network established between SDCNC particles and HPP. Additionally, increasing SDCNC loading in the composites led to higher crystallization peak temperatures and increased the degree of crystallinity (especially at 30 wt% SDCNC content), indicating that the SDCNC particles can act as heterogeneous nucleating agents during the crystallization process. The thermal stability of the composite was slightly improved upon SDCNC introduction. Highlights With the incorporation of spray‐dried cellulose nanocrystal (SDCNC), the tensile modulus of elasticity (MOE), flexural MOE, and impact strength of filled homopolymer polypropylene (HPP) composites were significantly improved by up to 67%, 49%, and 19%, respectively. Mechanical interlocking network established between SDCNC and HPP contributed to the enhanced the impact strength. SDCNC particles can act as heterogeneous nucleating agents to promote the crystallization process of HPP. SDCNC particles slightly enhanced the thermal stability of HPP composite.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA

Department of Chemistry and Physics Troy University Troy Alabama USA

School of Forest Resource University of Maine Orono Maine USA

Advanced Structures and Composites Center University of Maine Orono Maine USA

USDA‐Forest Service Southern Research Station Auburn Alabama USA

Funding

Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station · Southern Research Station · U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11646610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116466 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2592910.1002/pc.25929 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2717510.1002/pc.27175 ↗
4. 10.1039/9781849735315-0000110.1039/9781849735315-00001 ↗
5. 10.1039/C0CS00108B10.1039/C0CS00108B ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-642-45232-1_6410.1007/978-3-642-45232-1_64 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.013 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.05410.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.054 ↗
9. 10.1021/am500577e10.1021/am500577e ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.04310.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.043 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10570-011-9543-x10.1007/s10570-011-9543-x ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2665310.1002/pc.26653 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2613710.1002/pc.26137 ↗
14. 10.1002/9781119381228.ch810.1002/9781119381228.ch8 ↗
15. DemK.Polyethylene vs Polypropylene: When to Choose What? The material selection platform. Accessed May 24 2023.https://omnexus.specialchem.com/tech‐library/article/polyethylene‐versus‐polypropylene
16. 10.1002/pc.2438310.1002/pc.24383 ↗
17. 10.1021/bm050222v10.1021/bm050222v ↗
18. 10.1002/app.3644510.1002/app.36445 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.01610.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.016 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10570-011-9630-z10.1007/s10570-011-9630-z ↗
21. 10.1007/s10570-019-02642-310.1007/s10570-019-02642-3 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.10857110.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108571 ↗
23. Spray‐drying cellulose nanofibrils: effect of drying process parameters on particle morphology and size distribution
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.06.002 ↗
25. 10.1021/am302624t10.1021/am302624t ↗
26. 10.1007/s10570-019-02377-110.1007/s10570-019-02377-1 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.073 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.4929110.1002/app.49291 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2765810.1002/pc.27658 ↗
30. 10.1021/bm801193d10.1021/bm801193d ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tca.2015.04.00710.1016/j.tca.2015.04.007 ↗
32. 10.1002/pc.2549310.1002/pc.25493 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10570-007-9176-210.1007/s10570-007-9176-2 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.01210.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.012 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2323510.1002/pc.23235 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10570-017-1556-710.1007/s10570-017-1556-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.07.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2015.07.012 ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1109145610.3390/polym11091456 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.004 ↗
40. 10.1016/0032‐3861(81)90068‐910.1016/0032‐3861(81)90068‐9 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10570-012-9795-010.1007/s10570-012-9795-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00410.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004 ↗
43. 10.3390/jcs511030210.3390/jcs5110302 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10963910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109639 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10570-005-9039-710.1007/s10570-005-9039-7 ↗
46. 10.1002/pen.2206310.1002/pen.22063 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10570-019-02353-910.1007/s10570-019-02353-9 ↗
48. SamarasekaraA KumaraS MadhusankaA AmarasingheD KarunanayakeL.Study of thermal and mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose and nanocrystalline cellulose based thermoplastic material. IEEE; 2018:465‐470.10.1109/MERCon.2018.8421906 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.004 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.06010.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.060 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0032‐3861(99)00273‐610.1016/S0032‐3861(99)00273‐6 ↗
52. 10.1007/s00289-020-03178-410.1007/s00289-020-03178-4 ↗
53. 10.1002/app.518410.1002/app.5184 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.043 ↗
55. 10.1021/bm034519+10.1021/bm034519+ ↗
56. 10.1007/s10570-013-0019-z10.1007/s10570-013-0019-z ↗
57. 10.1002/app.1144610.1002/app.11446 ↗
58. 10.1023/A:101662110324510.1023/A:1016621103245 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.18710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.187 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.01.02010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.01.020 ↗
61. 10.1007/s10924-016-0845-910.1007/s10924-016-0845-9 ↗
62. 10.1177/089270570708232410.1177/0892705707082324 ↗
63. 10.1007/s10086-007-0889-510.1007/s10086-007-0889-5 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.009 ↗