journal article·2022-08

Use of Pennisetum glaucum stem powder waste as reinforcement in epoxy composites

Senthil S., Murugananthan K.

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The physicochemical, thermal, and tensile characteristics of Pennisetum glaucum stem powder (PGSP) are described in this article. According to chemical analysis, PGSP contains a larger percentage of cellulose (58.43 wt%) and lower percentages of hemicelluloses (12.86 wt%) and lignin (14.34 wt%). PGSP has a crystallinity index of 56.8%, with a crystallite size of 22.37 nm. A scanning electron microscopy and an atomic force microscopy were used to analyze the external morphology of PGSP. The thermogravimetric analysis of the PGSP exhibited a thermal constancy of 230°C and kinetic activation energy of 88.3 kJ/mol, indicating that it might be used as a filler material in thermoplastic resins with processing temperatures up to 230°C. Mechanical testing of PGSP‐reinforced epoxy composites signified that 9 wt% reinforcement is optimal to achieve improved properties. All the above findings of this investigation proved that PGSP can be used as a suitable primary and a secondary filler in polymer matrixes and it can also be used to make fused deposition modeling filaments for 3D printing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Kamaraj College of Engineering and Technology Madurai India

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. P. Jagadeesh, M. Puttegowda, S. Mavinkere Rangappa, S. Siengchin · Polym. Compos · 2021 · 42
2. Jagadeesh P. · Polym. Compos. · 2022 · 43
3. Sari N. H. · Polym. Compos. · 2022 · 43
4. 10.1002/pc.2616010.1002/pc.26160 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.01510.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.015 ↗
6. Kumar R. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2020 · 00 · 1
7. 10.1080/15440478.2020.178792010.1080/15440478.2020.1787920 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2567810.1002/pc.25678 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2630710.1002/pc.26307 ↗
10. Jagadeesh P. · Polym. Compos. · 2021 · 42
11. Sathish S. · Polym. Polym. Compos. · 2017 · 25 · 229
12. 10.1002/pc.2610310.1002/pc.26103 ↗
13. 10.1080/15440478.2018.144108910.1080/15440478.2018.1441089 ↗
14. Loganathan L. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2021
15. 10.1002/pc.2659610.1002/pc.26596 ↗
16. 10.1080/15440478.2021.194148410.1080/15440478.2021.1941484 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-021-03919-210.1007/s10570-021-03919-2 ↗
18. 10.1021/i560136a00710.1021/i560136a007 ↗
19. 10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2658010.1002/pc.26580 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2610610.1002/pc.26106 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2651310.1002/pc.26513 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2577110.1002/pc.25771 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.02510.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.025 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2481510.1002/pc.24815 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2264810.1002/pc.22648 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2546810.1002/pc.25468 ↗
28. Kathiresan M. · Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. · 2016 · 5341 · 1
29. 10.1002/pc.2637610.1002/pc.26376 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2489010.1002/pc.24890 ↗
31. 10.1080/15440478.2020.183899810.1080/15440478.2020.1838998 ↗
32. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.113313810.1080/1023666X.2016.1133138 ↗
33. Baskaran P. G. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2020 · 19
34. 10.1080/15440478.2018.144831810.1080/15440478.2018.1448318 ↗
35. 10.1177/152808371877944610.1177/1528083718779446 ↗
36. Ahmed M. J. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2021 · 18
37. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.111771210.1080/1023666X.2016.1117712 ↗
38. 10.1080/15440478.2019.162123210.1080/15440478.2019.1621232 ↗
39. Vijay R. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2021 · 18
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.05610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.056 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.06410.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.064 ↗
42. 10.1080/15440478.2018.145343210.1080/15440478.2018.1453432 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.02410.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.024 ↗
44. J. S.Binoj R.Edwin Raj B. S. S.Daniel Comprehensive characterization of industrially discarded fruit fiber Tamarindus indicaL. as a potential eco‐friendly bio‐reinforcement for polymer composite Elsevier Ltd 2017 142 1321.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.179 ↗
45. Manimaran P. · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 1807 · 2020 · 162
46. Manimaran P. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2018 · 17 · 1
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.072 ↗
48. 10.1080/15440478.2020.178849210.1080/15440478.2020.1788492 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.12710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.127 ↗
50. 10.1080/15440478.2022.205167110.1080/15440478.2022.2051671 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.09410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.094 ↗
52. Amutha V. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2019 · 00 · 1
53. Ganapathy T. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2019 · 00 · 1
54. 10.1080/15440478.2017.135474010.1080/15440478.2017.1354740 ↗
55. 10.1177/152808371983285110.1177/1528083719832851 ↗
56. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.123-125.103110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.123-125.1031 ↗
57. Vijay R. · J. Ind. Text. · 2020 · 49
58. 10.3390/polym1313208510.3390/polym13132085 ↗
59. 10.1177/0954408922107815010.1177/09544089221078150 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10965-019-1975-210.1007/s10965-019-1975-2 ↗