Use of Pennisetum glaucum stem powder waste as reinforcement in epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The physicochemical, thermal, and tensile characteristics of Pennisetum glaucum stem powder (PGSP) are described in this article. According to chemical analysis, PGSP contains a larger percentage of cellulose (58.43 wt%) and lower percentages of hemicelluloses (12.86 wt%) and lignin (14.34 wt%). PGSP has a crystallinity index of 56.8%, with a crystallite size of 22.37 nm. A scanning electron microscopy and an atomic force microscopy were used to analyze the external morphology of PGSP. The thermogravimetric analysis of the PGSP exhibited a thermal constancy of 230°C and kinetic activation energy of 88.3 kJ/mol, indicating that it might be used as a filler material in thermoplastic resins with processing temperatures up to 230°C. Mechanical testing of PGSP‐reinforced epoxy composites signified that 9 wt% reinforcement is optimal to achieve improved properties. All the above findings of this investigation proved that PGSP can be used as a suitable primary and a secondary filler in polymer matrixes and it can also be used to make fused deposition modeling filaments for 3D printing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Kamaraj College of Engineering and Technology Madurai India
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. P. Jagadeesh, M. Puttegowda, S. Mavinkere Rangappa, S. Siengchin · Polym. Compos · 2021 · 42
2. Jagadeesh P. · Polym. Compos. · 2022 · 43
3. Sari N. H. · Polym. Compos. · 2022 · 43
4. 10.1002/pc.2616010.1002/pc.26160 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.01510.1016/j.jmrt.2018.12.015 ↗
6. Kumar R. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2020 · 00 · 1
7. 10.1080/15440478.2020.178792010.1080/15440478.2020.1787920 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2567810.1002/pc.25678 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2630710.1002/pc.26307 ↗
10. Jagadeesh P. · Polym. Compos. · 2021 · 42
11. Sathish S. · Polym. Polym. Compos. · 2017 · 25 · 229
12. 10.1002/pc.2610310.1002/pc.26103 ↗
13. 10.1080/15440478.2018.144108910.1080/15440478.2018.1441089 ↗
14. Loganathan L. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2021
15. 10.1002/pc.2659610.1002/pc.26596 ↗
16. 10.1080/15440478.2021.194148410.1080/15440478.2021.1941484 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-021-03919-210.1007/s10570-021-03919-2 ↗
18. 10.1021/i560136a00710.1021/i560136a007 ↗
19. 10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2658010.1002/pc.26580 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2610610.1002/pc.26106 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2651310.1002/pc.26513 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2577110.1002/pc.25771 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.02510.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.025 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2481510.1002/pc.24815 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2264810.1002/pc.22648 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2546810.1002/pc.25468 ↗
28. Kathiresan M. · Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. · 2016 · 5341 · 1
29. 10.1002/pc.2637610.1002/pc.26376 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2489010.1002/pc.24890 ↗
31. 10.1080/15440478.2020.183899810.1080/15440478.2020.1838998 ↗
32. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.113313810.1080/1023666X.2016.1133138 ↗
33. Baskaran P. G. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2020 · 19
34. 10.1080/15440478.2018.144831810.1080/15440478.2018.1448318 ↗
35. 10.1177/152808371877944610.1177/1528083718779446 ↗
36. Ahmed M. J. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2021 · 18
37. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.111771210.1080/1023666X.2016.1117712 ↗
38. 10.1080/15440478.2019.162123210.1080/15440478.2019.1621232 ↗
39. Vijay R. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2021 · 18
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.05610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.056 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.06410.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.064 ↗
42. 10.1080/15440478.2018.145343210.1080/15440478.2018.1453432 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.02410.1016/j.matlet.2019.01.024 ↗
44. J. S.Binoj R.Edwin Raj B. S. S.Daniel Comprehensive characterization of industrially discarded fruit fiber Tamarindus indicaL. as a potential eco‐friendly bio‐reinforcement for polymer composite Elsevier Ltd 2017 142 1321.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.179 ↗
45. Manimaran P. · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 1807 · 2020 · 162
46. Manimaran P. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2018 · 17 · 1
47. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.07210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.072 ↗
48. 10.1080/15440478.2020.178849210.1080/15440478.2020.1788492 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.12710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.127 ↗
50. 10.1080/15440478.2022.205167110.1080/15440478.2022.2051671 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.09410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.094 ↗
52. Amutha V. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2019 · 00 · 1
53. Ganapathy T. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2019 · 00 · 1
54. 10.1080/15440478.2017.135474010.1080/15440478.2017.1354740 ↗
55. 10.1177/152808371983285110.1177/1528083719832851 ↗
56. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.123-125.103110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.123-125.1031 ↗
57. Vijay R. · J. Ind. Text. · 2020 · 49
58. 10.3390/polym1313208510.3390/polym13132085 ↗
59. 10.1177/0954408922107815010.1177/09544089221078150 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10965-019-1975-210.1007/s10965-019-1975-2 ↗