Graphite reinforced silane crosslinked high density polyethylene: The effect of filler loading on the thermal and mechanical properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Crosslinked polyethylene is a promising polymer regarding its mechanical properties and wear resistance, predominantly used in pipework systems. However, it suffers from low thermal conductivity, which limits its application in geothermal heating/cooling systems. In this work, crosslinked high‐density polyethylene (PEX) composites with spherical graphite (SG) as a reinforcing filler are examined in terms of their thermal and mechanical properties. Thermal conductivity measurements showed a significant improvement of the thermal conductivity of PEX with increasing filler content (40.6% augmentation for 5 wt% SG content), while the experimental data are in good agreement with the Chauhan theoretical model for spherical particles. Tensile tests revealed that the elastic modulus of PEX/SG composites presented a considerable improvement (23.6% augmentation for 5 wt% SG content). Various micromechanical models for the prediction of the composites' elastic behavior were applied to the experimental data, which present a satisfactory agreement with the Takayanagi I two‐phase model for low concentrations of SG, and the Takayanagi II two‐phase model for higher filler content.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Composite Material Mechanics · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus
School of Chemistry Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2418110.1002/pc.24181 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2016.10.018 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2426810.1002/pc.24268 ↗
4. Dai D. · 2013
5. 10.1007/s10973-017-6342-010.1007/s10973-017-6342-0 ↗
6. 10.1039/C4RA05585C10.1039/C4RA05585C ↗
7. 10.1080/01430750.2018.155754410.1080/01430750.2018.1557544 ↗
8. 10.1021/jp504531f10.1021/jp504531f ↗
9. 10.1002/macp.20130035510.1002/macp.201300355 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.02010.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.020 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.00610.1016/j.nanoms.2019.02.006 ↗
12. 10.1080/1558372070127127810.1080/15583720701271278 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1111188210.3390/polym11111882 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.005 ↗
16. Nagy B. · Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. · 2018 · 62 · 441
17. Abdullah N. M. · Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 226 · 012181
18. 10.5772/intechopen.7567610.5772/intechopen.75676 ↗
19. S.Mansour M.M.Ibrahim 94 4–10 (2015).10.3917/spi.075.0094 ↗
20. 10.3390/polym1109141110.3390/polym11091411 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2421910.1002/pc.24219 ↗
22. 10.1039/C8RA04205E10.1039/C8RA04205E ↗
23. 10.1007/s42114-018-0072-z10.1007/s42114-018-0072-z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.06910.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.069 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.027 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.003 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11148-013-9545-310.1007/s11148-013-9545-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10593810.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105938 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.02710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.027 ↗
30. 10.1021/jp075916810.1021/jp0759168 ↗
31. 10.1002/marc.20050004310.1002/marc.200500043 ↗
32. 10.3390/polym1102018910.3390/polym11020189 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.01410.1016/j.polymer.2017.11.014 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.022 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.02.00710.1016/j.coco.2020.02.007 ↗
36. 10.1002/polb.2340210.1002/polb.23402 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.2484410.1002/app.24844 ↗
38. 10.1155/2016/543682310.1155/2016/5436823 ↗
39. 10.1149/06611.0001ecst10.1149/06611.0001ecst ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.10210.1016/j.msea.2010.03.102 ↗
41. Patterson R. · 2013 · 697
42. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.018 ↗
43. 10.1002/mame.20120039710.1002/mame.201200397 ↗
44. Wunderlich B. · 1976
45. 10.1021/ma60059a00610.1021/ma60059a006 ↗
46. 10.1016/0032-3861(82)90048-910.1016/0032-3861(82)90048-9 ↗
47. 10.1002/pen.1114810.1002/pen.11148 ↗
48. 10.1021/ma960187810.1021/ma9601878 ↗
49. Wunderlich B. · 2005
50. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13583.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13583.x ↗
51. J.C. Maxwell Dover Publ. INC New York. 560 (1954).https://archive.org/stream/ATreatiseOnElectricityMagnetism‐Volume1/Maxwell‐ATreatiseOnElectricityMagnetismVolume1#page/n15/mode/2up/search/electromagnetic+radiation
52. Tobias C. W. · 1962
53. Lewis T. B. · Polym. Sci. · 1970 · 14 · 1449
54. Bar‐Cohen Avram · 2003 · 947
55. 10.1021/i160049a00410.1021/i160049a004 ↗
56. 10.4236/ijmnta.2012.1200510.4236/ijmnta.2012.12005 ↗
57. 10.3390/ma802055110.3390/ma8020551 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.05510.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.055 ↗
59. N. A. Jamal · J. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 2011 · 1
60. 10.1590/S1516-1439200900040002310.1590/S1516-14392009000400023 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.01110.1016/j.polymer.2017.05.011 ↗
62. Ian M Ward · 1998 · 167
63. 10.1002/app.1966.07010010910.1002/app.1966.070100109 ↗
64. 10.1063/1.166148210.1063/1.1661482 ↗
65. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.233608810.1063/1.2336088 ↗
67. 10.1021/ma300463y10.1021/ma300463y ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.00910.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.09.009 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.04810.1016/j.polymer.2012.07.048 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.09.02310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.09.023 ↗
71. 10.1002/andp.1905322080610.1002/andp.19053220806 ↗
72. Einstein A. · 1956
73. 10.1063/1.170749510.1063/1.1707495 ↗
74. 10.1115/1.363644610.1115/1.3636446 ↗
75. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-710.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7 ↗
76. 10.1016/0025-5416(67)90014-610.1016/0025-5416(67)90014-6 ↗
77. 10.1179/02670830222500355010.1179/026708302225003550 ↗