Improvement in electromechanical performance of degradable bio‐inspired soft ionic actuators with high energy density conductive electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recently, renewable natural electroactive soft ionic actuators have attracted widespread attention to its potential applications in biomedical equipment, soft robots, and micro‐nano actuators and sensors, and so on. However, low‐energy conversion rates, unstable stability, and slow response speed that severely constrain their practical application. In this article, three kinds of conductive nanoparticles (polyaniline [PANI], polythiophene and its derivatives [PEDOT], and acetylene black [ACET]) are co‐doped into the electrodes of chitosan/MCNT/rGO to prepare high performance soft ionic actuators, and specific capacitance, energy density, cycling stability, and conductivity have been significantly improved. Results showed that after doping three kinds of conductive nanoparticles, the electrode has the highest energy density (up to 145.922 Wh Kg−1), the highest conductivity (up to 850.91 S m−1) and good cycling stability with 82.55% of initial capacitance after 10 000 cycles. After assembling, ionic actuators have the maximum deflection displacement (up to 17.50 mm) increased by 7.6 times and the largest output force (up to 4.795 mN) increased by 2.465 times under power‐on excitation for 120 seconds of 5 V DC voltage. In addition, the displacement of ionic actuators with doping ACET electrode is better than actuators with the doped PANI electrode, while the output force of ionic actuators with doping PANI electrode is higher than actuators with the doped ACET electrode. This inconsistency indicates that the three conductive particles improve electrode performance through different mechanisms. This inconsistency demonstrates that the introduction of some conductive particles can enhance the ordered lamellar void structure inside the electrode and specific capacitance, and the introduction of some particles can improve the cycle stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Province Key Laboratory of Forestry Intelligent Equipment Engineering College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Northeast Forestry University Harbin People's Republic of China
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Bio‐based Material Science & Technology Northeast Forestry University Harbin People's Republic of China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/srep2446210.1038/srep24462 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms529310.1038/ncomms5293 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature2366810.1038/nature23668 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20170654710.1002/adma.201706547 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.11410.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.114 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-0728(83)80561-010.1016/S0022-0728(83)80561-0 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20130328210.1002/adfm.201303282 ↗
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/06502610.1088/0964-1726/24/6/065026 ↗
9. 10.3390/molecules2408162110.3390/molecules24081621 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.05910.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.059 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.7b1963510.1021/acsami.7b19635 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.03210.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.032 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.7b1104510.1021/acsami.7b11045 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.03210.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.032 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41565-019-0472-410.1038/s41565-019-0472-4 ↗
16. I. K.Khmelnitskiy A. O.Livshits N. I.Alekseyev et al. Soft ionic electroactive polymer actuators and sensors with graphene/polyaniline nanocomposite electrodes. in 2018 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus) Russia. IEEE 2018 419–422.10.1109/EIConRus.2018.8317123 ↗
17. 10.1039/C7RA05469F10.1039/C7RA05469F ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.16710.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.167 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.481298210.1063/1.4812982 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aax310310.1126/science.aax3103 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.20110.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.201 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.23810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.238 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.00410.1016/j.msec.2018.12.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.06910.1016/j.cej.2016.01.069 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.est.2015.05.00210.1016/j.est.2015.05.002 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10853-013-7804-910.1007/s10853-013-7804-9 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20170058710.1002/adma.201700587 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.02810.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.028 ↗
29. Zargar V. · Chem Bio Eng Rev · 2015 · 2 · 204
30. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.12.07310.1016/j.snb.2018.12.073 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.03.01510.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.03.015 ↗