journal article·2024-01-10

Mechanical performance of adhesively bonded carbon fiber reinforced boron‐modified phenolic resin plastic‐titanium single‐lap joints at high temperature

Guoqing Ma, Xiao Han, Liang Ying, Dezhi Wang, Chengwei Wu

Polymer Composites· Volume 45· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This article characterized the mechanical performance and failure mode of single‐lap joints (SLJs) of carbon fiber reinforced boron‐modified phenolic resin plastic (CF/BPR) and TC4 titanium alloy by quasi‐static tensile tests at four temperatures (25, 100, 175, and 250°C). The experimental results indicated that the shear strength of SLJs is 10.8 MPa at 25°C, which experiences monotonic drop to 80%, 42.6%, and 18.5% with temperature increase from 100 to 175°C, and to 250°C, respectively. Additionally, there was a transformation in the failure mode from composite material failure to cohesive failure in the adhesive along with the temperature increase. The intralaminar elasticities of CF/BPR were predicted using representative volume element (RVE), and the mechanical properties of three types of bondlines (i.e., the interlamination, interface of CF/BPR and the epoxy adhesive layer) were determined by both experiment and predictive methods. A finite element model taking into account the intralaminar damage of CF/BPR and the cohesive behavior of three bondlines was established. The simulated results showed good consistency with the experimental data for failure prediction, and the mechanical performance and damage propagation of SLJs at different temperatures were discussed. This research provides reference for the design and manufacture of high‐temperature bonded structures. Highlights RVE and degradation factor methods evaluate the elasticity of composite material. Four types of damage behaviors are considered in the established FE model. The SLJs exhibit single or multiple failure modes at different temperatures. The mechanical properties of SLJs severely degraded with increasing temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fire effects on concrete materials · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering Mechanics Dalian University of Technology Dalian China

School of Automotive Engineering Dalian University of Technology Dalian China

Institute of Petrochemistry, Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences Harbin China

Funding

Aeronautical Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1155/2014/82560710.1155/2014/825607 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.04710.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.047 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.00110.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.10510.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.105 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.06610.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.066 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2676610.1002/pc.26766 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2661310.1002/pc.26613 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.01110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.06.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.10.01110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.10.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.020 ↗
11. 10.3390/sym1112143710.3390/sym11121437 ↗
12. 10.1088/1742-6596/1507/6/06200910.1088/1742-6596/1507/6/062009 ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2512410.1002/pc.25124 ↗
14. 10.1163/156856111X59364910.1163/156856111X593649 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1423721410.3390/ma14237214 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00366-018-0616-410.1007/s00366-018-0616-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10352510.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103525 ↗
18. Aging behavior and failure prediction of interlaminar mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite at high temperature.
19. Study on durability of adhesively bonded CFRP‐Aluminum alloy joints exposed to extreme temperatures.
20. 10.1515/mt-2021-000710.1515/mt-2021-0007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.02.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.02.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.09510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.095 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.02010.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.017 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11416010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114160 ↗
27. Taheri‐Behrooz F · Struct Eng Mech · 2020 · 72 · 713
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.016 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10748810.1016/j.tws.2021.107488 ↗
30. 10.1177/002199832096707310.1177/0021998320967073 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.00510.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.005 ↗
32. Zhu Y · J. Compos Mater · 2019
33. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.10.08310.1016/j.ceramint.2021.10.083 ↗
34. Deng Y · J Vib Shock · 2020 · 39 · 70
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.029 ↗
36. 10.1177/073168441875435810.1177/0731684418754358 ↗
37. 10.1177/073168440707941310.1177/0731684407079413 ↗
38. 10.1080/00218464.2016.117221210.1080/00218464.2016.1172212 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10323210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103232 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10914110.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109141 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12206-021-0124-010.1007/s12206-021-0124-0 ↗
42. 10.3390/ma1522801310.3390/ma15228013 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.007 ↗