journal article·2022-12

A critical review on mechanical and morphological characteristics of injection molded biodegradable composites

Surya Rao Gorrepotu, Kishore Debnath, Rabindra Narayan Mahapatra, Tirumalai S. Srivatsan

Polymer Composites· Volume 43· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Factors like environmental and societal awareness often lead to a significant change of action in the development of eco‐friendly materials like the family of green composites. Green composites are becoming increasingly apparent as a sensible and potentially viable alternative to the synthetic composites. A healthy synergism of factors to include weight reduction, cost, performance improvement, biodegradable nature, nontoxic properties, and flexibility are often the key motives that provide the much needed impetus for the development of green composites for the purpose of selection and use in a spectrum of applications. The biodegradable or green composites became a viable substitute for the long‐established materials and often a challenge to the family of synthetic polymer‐based composites. The present study draws attention to the issues and challenges that come in the way of development and characterization of “green” composites primarily on the use of advanced manufacturing processes like injection molding. In this article, the chemical composition, structure, mechanical properties, and classification of the natural fibers are presented and briefly discussed. The mechanical properties, to include tensile response, flexural behavior, and impact strength, of the injection molded composites are presented and adequately discussed. The effect and role of surface treatments and coupling agents on mechanical properties of the family of polymer composites, to include the nonbiodegradable composites, partially green composites, and fully green composites, are examined and adequately discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering National Institute of Technology Meghalaya Shillong India

Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Akron Akron Ohio USA

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/089270571243957110.1177/0892705712439571 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11029-014-9422-210.1007/s11029-014-9422-2 ↗
3. Chokshi S. · J. Nat. Fibers · 2020 · 19 · 1
4. D.Jones G. O.Ormondroyd S. F.Curling C. M.Popescu andM. C.Popescu 1st ed. Advanced High Strength Natural Fibre in Construction Woodhead Publishing 2017 23.10.1016/B978-0-08-100411-1.00002-9 ↗
5. Lampke T. · Nat. Fibers, Biopolym. Bio Compos. · 2005 · 2005 · 52
6. S. D.Petroudy Woodhead Publishing 2017 59 59.
7. N. N. M.Peek Rapid prototyping of green composites (Doctoral dissertation Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 2010.
8. 10.1080/15440478.2013.82484810.1080/15440478.2013.824848 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.08.00610.1016/j.matlet.2006.08.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.00510.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.005 ↗
11. 10.1080/15440478.2017.134970710.1080/15440478.2017.1349707 ↗
12. 10.1080/15440478.2017.132151310.1080/15440478.2017.1321513 ↗
13. 10.1163/156855411X61025010.1163/156855411X610250 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.028 ↗
15. 10.1007/s40684-018-0015-810.1007/s40684-018-0015-8 ↗
16. 10.3390/su1202065210.3390/su12020652 ↗
17. 10.1002/mame.20130018910.1002/mame.201300189 ↗
18. A.Steeman Developments in wood‐fiber based packaging materialhttps://bestinpackaging.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/developments-in-wood-fiber-based-packaging-material2021.
19. H.Jan Schut Extruding biopolymers: Packaging reaps cost benefit of going “green.”https://www.ptonline.com/articles/extruding‐biopolymers‐packaging‐reaps‐cost‐benefit‐of‐going‐'green' (2021).
20. J. A.Grande Higher‐performing biopolymers seek new market opportunitieshttps://www.ptonline.com/articles/higher‐performing‐biopolymers‐seek‐new‐market‐opportunities(2021).
21. 10.3390/polym1205107210.3390/polym12051072 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1011128610.3390/ma10111286 ↗
23. JamesThomasHerobike Bamboost a bamboo composite e‐bike.https://bicycledesign.net/2015/05/herobike‐bamboost‐a‐bamboo‐composite‐e‐bike/2021.
24. DorisDe Guzman Strong growth for bioplastics in 2020https://greenchemicalsblog.com/2020/12/30/strong-growth-for-bioplastics-in-2020/2021.
25. Garkhail S. K. · ICCM · 1999 · 12 · 12
26. 10.1177/089270571142329110.1177/0892705711423291 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.07.00210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.07.002 ↗
29. 10.1177/09673911090170080310.1177/096739110901700803 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10570-012-9818-x10.1007/s10570-012-9818-x ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.028 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.022 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.004 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10924-008-0085-810.1007/s10924-008-0085-8 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.007 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10924-013-0636-510.1007/s10924-013-0636-5 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.011 ↗
38. 10.1201/978020350820610.1201/9780203508206 ↗
39. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.587-588.18710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.587-588.187 ↗
40. 10.1021/bm050897y10.1021/bm050897y ↗
41. 10.1021/sc500753h10.1021/sc500753h ↗
42. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.01110.1016/j.indcrop.2015.02.011 ↗
43. 10.1021/bm100311410.1021/bm1003114 ↗
44. Smith M. K. · Green Chem. · 2020 · 22
45. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.1610.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.16 ↗
46. Lila M. K. · Proc. Fab. Adv. Mater. · 2017
47. Tanetrungroj Y. · J. Sci. Tech. · 2015 · 37 · 193
48. 10.51850/wrj.2011.2.1.21-2610.51850/wrj.2011.2.1.21-26 ↗
49. Karakus K. · Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi · 2016 · 16 · 1
50. 10.12913/22998624/7115010.12913/22998624/71150 ↗
51. 10.3390/ijms2006137810.3390/ijms20061378 ↗
52. 10.1002/app.2177910.1002/app.21779 ↗
53. 10.1007/s10965-005-9012-z10.1007/s10965-005-9012-z ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.013 ↗
55. 10.3390/polym1207157110.3390/polym12071571 ↗
56. Reis R. L. · J. Polym. Proc. Inst. · 1997 · 16 · 263
57. 10.3390/polym1109151410.3390/polym11091514 ↗
58. 10.1155/2011/89194010.1155/2011/891940 ↗
59. Czigány T. · ICMM19 · 2013
60. 10.1002/pc.1052210.1002/pc.10522 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.08410.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.084 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10924-010-0280-210.1007/s10924-010-0280-2 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.023 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.05.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2009.05.001 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.015 ↗
66. 10.1002/mame.20100040310.1002/mame.201000403 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.03110.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.031 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.03310.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.033 ↗
69. 10.1002/mame.20110003910.1002/mame.201100039 ↗
70. 10.1142/S021797921006572610.1142/S0217979210065726 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.08010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.080 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.08.00510.1016/j.indcrop.2009.08.005 ↗
73. 10.1177/002199830809045210.1177/0021998308090452 ↗
74. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.5910.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.59 ↗
75. 10.3390/ma1009099810.3390/ma10090998 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.047 ↗
77. 10.1155/2015/51359010.1155/2015/513590 ↗
78. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1134.17810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1134.178 ↗
79. 10.1177/073168440810026410.1177/0731684408100264 ↗
80. Radzi M. M. · J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. · 2018 · 12 · 107
81. 10.1177/073168440910446510.1177/0731684409104465 ↗
82. 10.1080/1023666X.2016.114831610.1080/1023666X.2016.1148316 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10695610.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106956 ↗
84. 10.1039/C8TC01326H10.1039/C8TC01326H ↗
85. Kaymakci A. · Bio Res. · 2016 · 11 · 10112
86. Aliyegbenoma C. O. · J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. · 2019 · 23 · 2159
87. 10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS2/5779210.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS2/57792 ↗
88. 10.3390/polym1012139110.3390/polym10121391 ↗
89. 10.2495/HPSM10028110.2495/HPSM100281 ↗
90. 10.3390/polym1111188110.3390/polym11111881 ↗
91. 10.15282/jmes.12.4.2018.15.036110.15282/jmes.12.4.2018.15.0361 ↗
92. 10.1002/pc.1043410.1002/pc.10434 ↗
93. 10.1007/s10853-010-5134-810.1007/s10853-010-5134-8 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.04.01210.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.04.012 ↗
95. 10.1177/073168440707553610.1177/0731684407075536 ↗
96. 10.1002/app.4940410.1002/app.49404 ↗
97. 10.1504/IJMPT.2009.02782610.1504/IJMPT.2009.027826 ↗
98. 10.1155/2019/389437010.1155/2019/3894370 ↗
99. 10.3390/polym1207150310.3390/polym12071503 ↗
100. 10.1177/073168440809642610.1177/0731684408096426 ↗