journal article·2021-07

Comparison of the physicochemical, rheological, and mechanical properties of core and surface of polypropylene composite (GF50‐PP) plate fabricated by thermocompression process

Mohammad Hossein Nikooharf, Mojdeh Rezaei‐Khamseh, Mohammadali Shirinbayan, Joseph Fitoussi, Abbas Tcharkhtchi

Polymer Composites· Volume 42· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The microstructural properties and rheological behavior of the long‐glass‐fiber‐reinforced polypropylene (GF50‐PP) composite produced by the compression molding process were studied and modeled. Composite plates of GF50‐PP with different thicknesses of 4, 12, and 24 mm have been used to study the effect of glass fiber distribution and various thicknesses on the properties of the core and the surface of the composites. Physicochemical characteristics and rheological behavior of the surface and the core of the plates have been compared. The effect of material sampling area on glass transition temperature, melting temperature, crystallization temperature, degree of crystallinity (Xc), and viscosity were analyzed. Mechanical tests have been carried out to assess the impact of the process parameters on the mechanical characteristics. The results showed that in the compression molding process, three competing parameters should be considered: the Xc, fiber accumulation, and presence of porosity. One can note that this study is applicable to present the relation or interaction between process, microstructure, and properties of the GF50‐PP composite prepared by the thermocompression method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology CNAM, PIMM, HESAM University Paris France

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s13726-020-00794-910.1007/s13726-020-00794-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.033 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12241110.1016/j.polymer.2020.122411 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-981-32-9072-3_6510.1007/978-981-32-9072-3_65 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.010 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma506108410.3390/ma5061084 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10576510.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105765 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.014 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00010-510.1016/S1359-835X(00)00010-5 ↗
10. 10.1021/am402750t10.1021/am402750t ↗
11. Courtney T. H. · 2005
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.10830310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.108303 ↗
13. 10.1002/vnl.2151410.1002/vnl.21514 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2436910.1002/pc.24369 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.006 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.02.03310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.02.033 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.010 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.05310.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.053 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10605610.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106056 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.03.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.03.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.05110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.051 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.071 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11188410.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111884 ↗
24. 10.3390/polym1107119810.3390/polym11071198 ↗
25. X.Yan P.Uawongsuwan M.Murakami A.Imajo Y.Yang andH.Hamada Paper presented at: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition2016 vol.50527: American Society of Mechanical Engineers p.V002T02A045.
26. 10.1002/pc.2437810.1002/pc.24378 ↗
27. L.Yu Z.Cui S. Yan S. Nojima Y. Yang H. 21st International Conference on Composite Materials Xi'an China 20‐25th August2017.
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.035 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.020 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2343010.1002/pc.23430 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.026 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.04310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.043 ↗
33. Hoang T. Q. T. · Polym. Polym. Compos. · 2013 · 21 · 287
34. Kuhn C. · 2018
35. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10738510.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107385 ↗
36. Kumar B. S. · Int. Scholarly Res. Not. · 2014 · 2014 · 441
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.007 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10593910.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105939 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.2452310.1002/pc.24523 ↗
40. E. ISO 527–1.Plastics—Determination of tensile properties—Part 1: General principles International Organization of Standardization: Geneva Switzerland2012.
41. Zieba‐Palus J. · Forensic Sci. Criminol. · 2017 · 2 · 1
42. 10.1590/S0103-5053201100080001010.1590/S0103-50532011000800010 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.02410.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.024 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)10279-810.1016/S0032-3861(97)10279-8 ↗
45. B. B.Burnett W. F.McDevit Mater. Sci. Eng. A1957 28 1101.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722586.10.1063/1.1722586 ↗
46. 10.1002/pol.1968.16006010910.1002/pol.1968.160060109 ↗
47. M.Aressy Etude et modélisation de la cristallisation du Polylactide (PLA) en vue de l'optimisation du procédé de rotomoulage 2013.