journal article·2021-03Open access

Numerical‐experimental structural instability analysis of composite tubes considering manufacturing parameters and imperfections

Eduardo Gerhardt, Rogério J. Marczak, Sandro C. Amico

Polymer Composites· Volume 42· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract A numerical‐experimental approach to predict structural instability was developed to analyze thin composite tubes produced by filament winding subjected to external pressure. The divergence between mechanical properties characterized through standardized procedures and those of the manufactured component, influenced by imperfections and manufacturing peculiarities, was considered. A ring compression test and an inverse finite element analysis routine were used for material properties calibration. The routine was based on Tsai's master‐ply concept to deliver feasible constitutive properties values. Based on the numerical and experimental correlation, the implemented approach was considered effective and with good repeatability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

PPGE3M Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

PROMEC Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

Department of Mechanical Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Bushnell D. · 2012
2. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.09.00910.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.09.009 ↗
3. Choqueuse D. · 2014
4. 10.1016/0010-4361(75)90374-210.1016/0010-4361(75)90374-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.06.01010.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.06.010 ↗
6. 10.1177/073168441559226110.1177/0731684415592261 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.09.02910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.09.029 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2008.01.04310.1016/j.tws.2008.01.043 ↗
9. Arbelo M. · 2013
10. Degenhardt R. · 2014
11. 10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00014-910.1016/S0263-8223(01)00014-9 ↗
12. 10.1002/978047017299510.1002/9780470172995 ↗
13. 10.31399/asm.tb.cfw.978162708338610.31399/asm.tb.cfw.9781627083386 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.07.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2007.07.020 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.018 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.08.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.08.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.017 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.05510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.055 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.025 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.05410.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.054 ↗
22. Barbero E. J. · 2017
23. 10.1016/B978-0-08-050073-7.50009-910.1016/B978-0-08-050073-7.50009-9 ↗
24. Hinton M. J. · 2004
25. 10.1177/00219983710050010610.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
26. DNV‐OS‐C501 composite components Offshore Standard Det Norske Veritas AS Oslo2013.
27. ABAQUS® Documentation Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. Providence2012.
28. MatLab® 8.0 Documentation The Mathworks Inc. Natick2015.
29. 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.30810.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.triboint.2003.11.00810.1016/j.triboint.2003.11.008 ↗
31. Boyer H. E. · 1987
32. Crisfield M. A. · 1991
33. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<9::AID-NME793>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000110/30)47:1/3<9::AID-NME793>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
34. Kalnis K. · 2015