journal article·2020-05

Mechanisms of inter‐ply void formation during vacuum bag‐only cure of woven prepregs

Wei Hu, Timotei Centea, Steven Nutt

Polymer Composites· Volume 41· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The removal of inter‐ply air is critical for limiting porosity in laminates. In this study, an in situ monitoring technique was employed to observe inter‐ply air evolution during vacuum bag‐only cure. Observations showed that reduced vacuum resulted in inefficient inter‐ply air evacuation, a more rapid bubble expansion rate, and formation of new air bubbles. A modified tow impregnation model showed that resin infiltration was impeded at reduced vacuum conditions due to the presence of intra‐tow air. However, the cured laminates showed that tows were fully impregnated in all cases, indicating that the entrapped intra‐tow air migrated to inter‐ply regions during cure. The interactions between intra‐tow and inter‐tow air at deficient vacuum conditions were revealed. Findings led to the conclusion that air remaining in intra‐tow regions contributed more to the increase of inter‐ply voids than the reduction in consolidation pressure difference associated with reduced vacuum.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

M. C. Gill Composites Center University of Southern California Los Angeles California

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.029 ↗
2. 10.1177/002199830606528910.1177/0021998306065289 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001 ↗
4. 10.1177/00219983920260100610.1177/002199839202601006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.009 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2010.09.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.001 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199831349410110.1177/0021998313494101 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2295210.1002/pc.22952 ↗
10. J.Wells J.Kay A.Poursartip M.Lane G.Fernlund. Surface and Bulk Porosity in Out‐of‐Autoclave Prepregs.Proc. Int. Conf. Compos. Mater. (ICCM‐20). Copenhagen Denmark July 19–24 2015 p.12.
11. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.10.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.10.004 ↗
12. 10.1177/002199831877215210.1177/0021998318772152 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.013 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.04.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2015.04.009 ↗
15. 10.1177/002199831665027310.1177/0021998316650273 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831875918310.1177/0021998318759183 ↗
17. W.Hu S.Nutt. In‐situ montoring of air removal during vacuum bag‐only (VBO) processing.21st Int. Conf. Compos. Mater. Xi'an 20‐25th 2017.
18. 10.1177/002199831559200510.1177/0021998315592005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.02810.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.028 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.034 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.027 ↗
22. West BP · The Consolidation of Commingled Thermoplastic · 1971 · 12 · 417
23. S.Howard. Evaluating consolidation dynamics—Study of key consolidation parameters in a vacuum bag only (VBO) cure.Proc. SAMPE 2016 Tech. Conf. Long Beach CA 2016.
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.004 ↗
25. Kratz J. · 2013
26. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00128-X10.1016/0266-3538(95)00128-X ↗
27. 10.1177/002199831349491710.1177/0021998313494917 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.02710.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.027 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.002 ↗