An investigation into hyper‐elastic behavior of BR/epoxy‐polyester hybrid/nanoclay nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Butadiene Rubber (BR) was compounded with different compositions of Cloisite 15 and epoxy‐polyester hybrid (EPH), a powder coating waste, using a laboratory‐scale internal mixer at 100°C. Micromechanics of BR/Cloisite 15A (100/3, 100/5, and 100/7), BR/EPH (100/10, 100/20, 100/30, and 100/40) and BR/EPH/Cloisite 15A (100/20/3, 100/20/5, and 100/20/7) compounds were compared to the pure BR through uniaxial tensile and compression measurements. Micromechanical models including Halpin‐Tsai, Leidner‐Woodhams, Pukanszky, and Guth were used to estimate the nanoclay aspect ratio among which Halpin‐Tsai could present more acceptable conclusions confirmed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Finite element modeling through constitutive hyper‐elastic models, that is, Arruda‐Boyce, Marlow, Third‐order Ogden, Mooney‐Rivlin, second‐order polynomial, Van der Waals, Neo‐Hooke, and Yeoh was conducted (ABAQUS® software). Simulation results compared with the experimental data suggested that Marlow, Van der Waals, and Yeoh could describe the behavior of this material at whole strain ranges with an acceptable accuracy. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:E2028–E2035, 2018. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Graduate studies Islamic Azad University, South‐Tehran Branch Tehran Iran
Department of Rubber Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute Tehran Iran
Chemical, Polymeric and Petrochemical Technology Development Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry Tehran Iran
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Aidy A. · J. Sci. Industrial Res. · 2010 · 69 · 495
2. Harper C.A. · 1975
3. 10.5254/1.354760210.5254/1.3547602 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00466-004-0593-y10.1007/s00466-004-0593-y ↗
5. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00768-510.1016/S0032-3861(99)00768-5 ↗
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991010)74:2<328::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991010)74:2<328::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.2129410.1002/pen.21294 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.2129410.1002/pen.21294 ↗
9. 10.1179/1433075X13Y.000000009910.1179/1433075X13Y.0000000099 ↗
10. 10.1002/app.3955610.1002/app.39556 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.3775210.1002/app.37752 ↗
12. 10.1002/vnl.2148010.1002/vnl.21480 ↗
13. 10.4236/mnsms.2016.6200410.4236/mnsms.2016.62004 ↗
14. Wei D. · China Rubber Indust · 2007 · 8
15. 10.1063/1.170749510.1063/1.1707495 ↗
16. 10.1080/14658011.2016.121296710.1080/14658011.2016.1212967 ↗
17. Esmizadeh E. · Polym. Compos. · 2016
18. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5RA19021E10.1039/C5RA19021E ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.013 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0058011010.1007/BF00580110 ↗
22. Móczóand J. · 2016 · 1
23. 10.1002/pi.130710.1002/pi.1307 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.1984.07029050610.1002/app.1984.070290506 ↗
25. 10.1002/pen.2057810.1002/pen.20578 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.031 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.02510.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.025 ↗
28. Gent A. N. · 1992
29. 10.5254/1.354759710.5254/1.3547597 ↗
30. Marlow R. S. · 2003
31. 10.1002/pc.2019910.1002/pc.20199 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.012 ↗
33. Bhowmick A.K. · Polym. Polym. Compos. · 2008 · 16 · 283
34. Anghelache G. · Mater. Plast. · 2008 · 45 · 143
35. D. M.Oza andA.Londhe.SAE Technical Paper(2016). DOI:10.4271/2016-01-040310.4271/2016-01-0403 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00032-510.1016/S0167-6636(98)00032-5 ↗