journal article·2016-06

Thermal and barrier properties of EVOH/EFG nanocomposite films for packaging applications: Effect of the mixing method

Hyok Kwon, Dowan Kim, Jongchul Seo

Polymer Composites· Volume 37· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Ethylene‐vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH)/exfoliated graphite (EFG) nanocomposite films were prepared by precoating EFG on the EVOH surface and conducting a successive melt‐extrusion process. Their physical properties were strongly dependent on the EFG content and the mixing method, which strongly affected the morphology and surface properties of the nanocomposite films. The hydrophobicity and water resistance property of EVOH increased by incorporating hydrophobic EFG and their effects were more pronounced in the precoating method, which is related to good dispersion of EFG in EVOH and an enhanced crystalline structure. The incorporation of EFG into EVOH by the precoating method more effectively diminished the dependence of the relative humidity on the oxygen transmission rate of pure EVOH and increased the oxygen barrier properties of EVOH at a high relative humidity. The incorporation of EFG into EVOH by the precoating method also induced relatively more enhanced thermal stability. These results suggest the feasibility of the application of moisture‐sensitive EVOH resin for food packaging films. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:1744–1753, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Science and PVC

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Packaging Yonsei University 1 Yonseidae‐gil Wonju‐si Gangwon‐do 220‐710 Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea Grant founded by the Korean Government

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.11.01110.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.11.011 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ifset.2004.09.00210.1016/j.ifset.2004.09.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.02410.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.024 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.01810.1016/j.polymer.2004.05.018 ↗
5. 10.1080/10408398.2010.50490310.1080/10408398.2010.504903 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.03.02910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.03.029 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.01710.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.01.04610.1016/j.apcatb.2011.01.046 ↗
9. 10.1080/10601325.2013.76844010.1080/10601325.2013.768440 ↗
10. 10.1007/s13233-013-1124-410.1007/s13233-013-1124-4 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2270710.1002/pc.22707 ↗
12. 10.1163/15685540432297140410.1163/156855404322971404 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.014 ↗
14. 10.1002/pen.2077210.1002/pen.20772 ↗
15. Ismail H. · Iranian Polym. J. · 2010 · 19 · 297
16. Henriette de Azeredo M.C. · Food Res. Int. · 2009 · 42 · 124010.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.019 ↗
17. Kwon O.Y. · J. Ind. Eng. Chem. · 2003 · 9 · 743
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.00510.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.005 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2247510.1002/pc.22475 ↗
20. Zenkiewicz M. · J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. · 2007 · 24 · 137
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.12.04910.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.12.049 ↗
22. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.5010.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.50 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.04.00510.1016/j.polymer.2009.04.005 ↗
24. 10.1002/pi.302510.1002/pi.3025 ↗
25. 10.1002/pi.443410.1002/pi.4434 ↗
26. Arboleda C. · Vitae · 2007 · 14 · 25
27. 10.1002/1099-0488(20001101)38:21<2714::AID-POLB20>3.0.CO;2-610.1002/1099-0488(20001101)38:21<2714::AID-POLB20>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
28. 10.1002/mame.20080031910.1002/mame.200800319 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00313-310.1016/S0032-3861(97)00313-3 ↗
30. 10.1080/0022234100360370110.1080/00222341003603701 ↗
31. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/12/12570510.1088/0957-4484/20/12/125705 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.203010.1002/app.2030 ↗
33. 10.1039/c1jm13213j10.1039/c1jm13213j ↗
34. 10.1163/156856108X37916410.1163/156856108X379164 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.2043610.1002/app.20436 ↗
36. Yam K.L. · 2000