journal article·2017-06

Mechanical properties of poly( l ‐lactic acid) composites filled with mesoporous silica

Ji‐Zhao Liang, Feng‐Jiao Li

Polymer Composites· Volume 38· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanical properties of mesoporous silica (MCM‐41) filled poly( l ‐lactic acid) (PLA4032D) composites and PLA4032D/poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) composites were investigated. It was found that the Young's modulus increased while tensile strength decreased with increasing the filler content; the V‐notched impact fracture strengths of both Izod and Charpy for the PLA4032D/PEG/MCM‐41 composites increased while they decreased slightly for the PLA4032D/MCM‐41 composites, the unnotched Charpy impact strength of both the two composites decreased with increasing the filler loading; the flexural modulus increased slightly while the flexural strength decreased slightly with increasing the filler content. The toughening mechanisms of the composites were discussed by means of observing the impact fracture surface with a scanning electronic microscope, and the synergistic effect between the PEG and MCM‐41 should be one of the major toughening mechanisms. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:1118–1126, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Division of Green Function Materials and Equipment, School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510640 People's Republic of China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1841::AID-ADMA1841>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/1521-4095(200012)12:23<1841::AID-ADMA1841>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
2. 10.1023/A:102020082243510.1023/A:1020200822435 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.05.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.05.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/0278-6915(94)00145-E10.1016/0278-6915(94)00145-E ↗
6. 10.1002/mabi.20040004310.1002/mabi.200400043 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.1335410.1002/app.13354 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.01910.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.019 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.01010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.09210.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.092 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.03.01610.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.03.016 ↗
12. 10.1002/pen.2205210.1002/pen.22052 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.1151710.1002/pen.11517 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.11.01210.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.11.012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.00310.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.003 ↗
16. 10.1002/macp.1994.02195051510.1002/macp.1994.021950515 ↗
17. 10.1002/macp.1994.02195051610.1002/macp.1994.021950516 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10924-014-0661-z10.1007/s10924-014-0661-z ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.02.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.02.008 ↗
20. 10.1002/mabi.20070002710.1002/mabi.200700027 ↗
21. 10.1021/bm050581q10.1021/bm050581q ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.015 ↗
23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971121)66:8<1495::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971121)66:8<1495::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.1254910.1002/app.12549 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199831453596110.1177/0021998314535961 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.07110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.071 ↗
27. 10.1177/002199830936093410.1177/0021998309360934 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.019 ↗