journal article·2021-11

Bond behavior of BFRP bars in concrete under lateral pressure

Yushuai Zhao, Yingying Zhang, Penghao Yu, Junhao Xu

Polymer Composites· Volume 42· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars have been widely studied because of its advantages in corrosive environment. At present, the researches on the bond properties of basalt FRP bars mainly focus on the types of bars, bond length and environmental effects. In this paper, the bond properties of 12 mm diameter glass fiber reinforced bars with unilateral and bilateral compressive stresses of 0, 0.15, 0.3, 0.45, 0.6 and 0.75 were studied for revealing the effects of lateral stress. In addition, based on the analysis of the influence of compressive stress on the failure mode, a theoretical analysis model is established. Based on the fitting of ultimate bond strength and slip amount, the bond slip constitutive model of basalt fiber embedded in concrete is proposed, which can work under different compressive stress.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Environmental Impact and Structural Safety in Engineering, State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering China University of Mining and Technology Xuzhou China

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000048710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000487 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.21110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.211 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11983910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119839 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.032 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11680310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116803 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.06810.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.068 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000088710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000887 ↗
9. Hua Y. · J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. · 2020 · 40
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000016110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000161 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12059110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120591 ↗
12. Dymond B. · 2009
13. 10.1680/macr.13.0012310.1680/macr.13.00123 ↗
14. 10.1139/l05-06610.1139/l05-066 ↗
15. Kong F. · Struct. J. · 1996 · 93 · 21
16. 10.1680/macr.1984.36.129.19510.1680/macr.1984.36.129.195 ↗
17. 10.1016/0143-7496(82)90126-910.1016/0143-7496(82)90126-9 ↗
18. CEB‐FIP.Model Code 2010. Swizerland 2012.
19. Untrauer R. · ACI J. · 1965 · 62 · 577
20. 10.3390/app907134010.3390/app9071340 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000036510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000365 ↗
22. Xu F. · ACI Struct. J. · 2014 · 111 · 15
23. 10.1139/cjce-2015-033310.1139/cjce-2015-0333 ↗
24. Wambeke B. · ACI Struct. J. · 2006 · 103 · 11
25. Yang H. · J. Build. Struct. · 2020 · 41 · 115