A statistical optimization of a green laser‐assisted ablation process towards automatic bonded repairs of CFRP composites
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, an optimization of a laser‐based ablation process of aeronautical carbon‐fiber reinforced polymers is aimed via statistical tools such as the design of experiments, the analysis of variance and response surface methodologies. Three basic process parameters and their interactions is under examination that is, the laser beam scanning speed, the pulse repetition frequency and the hatching distance between two scan lines. A green short‐pulsed laser with a central wavelength at 532 nm is for the first time utilized for the ablation task with the purpose of bulk material removal prior to a structural repair. The Box–Behnken Design and a three‐level factorial design are implemented to define the minimum number of experimental trials and build an appropriate test matrix. The results identify the statistically significant parameters that affect five selected responses namely the material removal rate, the shear strength of a stepped‐lap joint and the heat affected zones measured at three locations. Quadratic models are fitted to the experimental data and a near‐optimal solution is identified at the multi‐objective optimization task of laser‐assisted ablation of carbon‐fiber polymer composites. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:3084–3100, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Laser Material Processing Techniques · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical & Aeronautical Engineering University of Patras Patras 26504 Greece
Funding
European Union H2020 Programme
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2013.03.003 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.04910.1016/j.procir.2015.06.049 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.02510.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.025 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.08010.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.080 ↗
6. 10.1080/00218464.2012.66004210.1080/00218464.2012.660042 ↗
7. 10.1080/09243046.2015.105213010.1080/09243046.2015.1052130 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.07110.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.071 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.13610.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.136 ↗
10. 10.2351/1.480708210.2351/1.4807082 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.07510.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.075 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.06610.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.066 ↗
13. K.Y.Blohowiak M.N.Watson A.Marcus T.Belcher E.Castro J.Baldwin andS.Koch “Laser Scarfing for Adhesive Bonded Composite Repairs” inSAMPE 2013 Proceedings: Education & Green Sky—Materials Technology for a Better World Long Beach CA (2013).
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.08.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2013.08.004 ↗
15. 10.1002/pen.2456010.1002/pen.24560 ↗
16. Montgomery D.C. · 1996
17. 10.1080/00401706.1960.1048991210.1080/00401706.1960.10489912 ↗
18. JASP Team JASP (Version 0.8.1) Computer software. Available at:https://jasp-stats.org/(2018)
19. 10.1080/00218464.2017.139697510.1080/00218464.2017.1396975 ↗