journal article·2005-06Open access

Correlation between sizing formulation and compressive behavior of concentrated glass bundle suspensions

Dima Merhi, Emmanuelle Comte, Veronique Michaud, Jan‐Anders E. Månson

Polymer Composites· Volume 26· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract The correlation between sizing formulation, bundle mechanical characteristics, and bundle–matrix static and dynamic interactions are investigated. Two glass‐fiber sizing formulations are considered, one containing polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) and the other polyester/PVAc, as conventionally used in sheet molding compounds (SMC). Axial compression tests are conducted on dry two‐dimensional (2D) random suspensions. The forced packing is governed by the bending of fiber bundle segments between bundle‐bundle contact points. Benchmarking of the experimental curves with a modified theoretical model provides an estimation of the fiber bundle bending rigidity under forced packing conditions. This value is found to depend on the bundle sizing as well as on the interaction with solvents present in the matrix as is the case for SMC. Free flow and molding experiments are performed on planar SMC sheets using the two different fiber bundles as reinforcements. The results confirm the dependence of the molding energy and the SMC rheology on the bundles chemical and mechanical characteristics. POLYM. COMPOS., 26:370–376, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Material Properties and Processing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Vetrotex Saint‐Gobian Europ. Cent. Tests and Real. · Les cahiers du Plastique · 1978 · 51
2. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00124-X10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00124-X ↗
3. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)96806-H10.1016/0010-4361(95)96806-H ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.1031210.1002/pc.10312 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.75005011410.1002/pc.750050114 ↗
6. 10.1122/1.55101510.1122/1.551015 ↗
7. 10.1122/1.55053910.1122/1.550539 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00108-010.1016/S1359-835X(98)00108-0 ↗
9. 10.1177/07316844960150080710.1177/073168449601500807 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00195-010.1016/S0266-3538(00)00195-0 ↗
11. 2003 University of Montpellier II Montpellier V. Feuillade Etude de l'influence de la formulation de l'ensimage des fibres de verre sur la qualité de surface des composites SMC de type ‘Classe A’
12. 10.1080/1944702460865927910.1080/19447024608659279 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.1030410.1002/pen.10304 ↗
14. 10.1122/1.55101410.1122/1.551014 ↗
15. S.V.Lomov “Bending Rigidity of Glass Rovings ” Report University of Leuven Leuven (2004).
16. 10.1002/pen.76021081010.1002/pen.760210810 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00094-310.1016/S1359-835X(98)00094-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.007 ↗
19. L.MarkerandB.Ford in Proc. 32nd Ann. Tech. Conf. Reinforced Plastics/Composites Insitute Society of Plastics Industry Inc. Washington DC (1977).
20. 10.1016/0377-0257(87)80040-X10.1016/0377-0257(87)80040-X ↗